...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >Isolated transient vertigo: posterior circulation ischemia or benign origin?
【24h】

Isolated transient vertigo: posterior circulation ischemia or benign origin?

机译:孤立性短暂性眩晕:后循环缺血或良性起源?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Isolated transient vertigo can be the only symptom of posterior circulation ischemia. Thus, it is important to differentiate isolated vertigo of a cerebrovascular origin from that of more benign origins, as patients with cerebral ischemia have a much higher risk for future stroke than do those with ‘peripheral’ vertigo. The current study aims to identify risk factors for cerebrovascular origin of isolated transient vertigo, and for future cerebrovascular events. Methods From the files of 339 outpatients with isolated transient vertigo we extracted history, clinical and technical findings, diagnosis, and follow-up information on subsequent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Risk factors were analyzed using multivariate regression models (logistic or Cox) and reconfirmed in univariate analyses. Results On first presentation, 48 (14.2%) patients received the diagnosis ‘probable or definite cerebrovascular vertigo’. During follow-up, 41 patients suffered stroke or TIA (event rate 7.9 per 100 person years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5–10.4), 26 in the posterior circulation (event rate 4.8 per 100 person years, 95% CI 3.0–6.7). The diagnosis was not associated with follow-up cerebrovascular events. In multivariate models testing multiple potential determinants, only the presentation mode was consistently associated with the diagnosis and stroke risk: patients who presented because of vertigo (rather than reporting vertigo when they presented for other reasons) had a significantly higher risk for future stroke or TIA ( p =?0.028, event rate 13.4 vs. 5.4 per 100 person years) and for future posterior circulation stroke or TIA ( p =?0.044, event rate 7.8 vs. 3.5 per 100 person years). Conclusions We here report for the first time follow-up stroke rates in patients with transient isolated vertigo. In such patients, the identification of those with cerebrovascular origin remains difficult, and presentation mode was found to be the only consistent risk factor. Confirmation in an independent prospective sample is needed.
机译:背景短暂性眩晕可能是后循环缺血的唯一症状。因此,将脑血管源性孤立性眩晕与良性源性眩晕区分开来很重要,因为与“周围性”眩晕患者相比,脑缺血患者未来中风的风险更高。当前的研究旨在确定孤立的短暂性眩晕的脑血管起源以及未来脑血管事件的危险因素。方法从339例孤立的短暂性眩晕患者的档案中,我们提取了有关随后的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的病史,临床和技术发现,诊断以及随访信息。使用多元回归模型(逻辑或Cox)分析风险因素,并在单因素分析中再次确认。结果首次就诊时,有48名(14.2%)患者被诊断为“可能或确定的脑血管性眩晕”。在随访期间,有41例中风或TIA患者(事件发生率7.9每100人年,95%置信区间(CI)5.5-10.4),后循环中有26例患者(事件发生率4.8每100人年,95%CI 3.0) –6.7)。诊断与随访脑血管事件无关。在测试多个潜在决定因素的多变量模型中,只有呈报模式与诊断和中风风险始终相关:由于眩晕(而不是因其他原因呈报眩晕)而呈报的患者未来中风或TIA的风险明显更高(p =?0.028,事件发生率13.4对每100人年5.4)和未来的后循环中风或TIA(p =?0.044,事件发生率7.8对每100人年3.5)。结论我们在此首次报告了短暂性孤立性眩晕患者的中风率。在此类患者中,仍然难以鉴定具有脑血管起源的患者,并且发现模式是唯一一致的危险因素。需要在独立的预期样本中进行确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号