首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee tendinopathies and other soft tissue disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee tendinopathies and other soft tissue disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:体外冲击波疗法对膝肌腱病和其他软组织疾病的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT), which can be divided into radial shock-wave therapy (RaSWT) and focused shock-wave therapy (FoSWT), has been widely used in clinical practice for managing orthopedic conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of ESWT for knee soft tissue disorders (KSTDs) and compare the efficacy of different shock-wave types, energy levels, and intervention durations. We performed a comprehensive search of online databases and search engines without restrictions on the publication year or language. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy of ESWT for KSTDs and included them in a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. The pooled effect sizes of ESWT were estimated by computing odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment success rate (TSR) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs for pain reduction (i.e., the difference in pain relief, which was the change in pain from baseline to the end of RCTs between treatment and control groups) and for restoration of knee range of motion (ROM). We included 19 RCTs, all of which were of high or medium methodological quality and had a Physiotherapy Evidence Database score of ≥5/10. In general, ESWT had overall significant effects on the TSR (OR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.84–6.12, P?
机译:体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)可分为放射冲击波疗法(RaSWT)和聚焦冲击波疗法(FoSWT),在临床实践中已广泛用于管理骨科疾病。这项研究的目的是确定ESWT对膝部软组织疾病(KSTD)的临床疗效,并比较不同冲击波类型,能量水平和干预时间的疗效。我们对在线数据库和搜索引擎进行了全面搜索,而不受出版年份或语言的限制。我们选择了报告ESWT对KSTD疗效的随机对照试验(RCT),并将其纳入荟萃分析和偏倚风险评估中。通过计算具有95%置信区间(CIs)的治疗成功率(TSR)的比值比(OR)和具有95%CI的减轻疼痛的标准化均值差(SMD)来估算ESWT的合并效应量(即,差异缓解疼痛,这是治疗组和对照组之间从基线到RCT结束之间的疼痛变化),以及恢复膝盖的运动范围(ROM)。我们纳入了19个RCT,所有这些均具有较高或中等的方法学质量,并且物理治疗证据数据库得分≥5/ 10。总的来说,ESWT对TSR具有总体上显着的影响(或:3.36,95%CI:1.84-6.12,P 0.0001),减轻疼痛(SMD:1.49,95%CI:2.11至? 0.87,P 0.00001)和ROM恢复(SMD:1.76,95%CI:1.43-2.09,P 0.00001)。亚组分析显示,长期(≥1个月)应用FoSWT和RaSWT对减轻疼痛有显著作用,相应的SMD为3.13.13(95%CI:05.70至0.50.56; P?=?)。 0.02)和1.80(95%CI:2.52至1.08;P≤0.00001)。与高能FoSWT相比,低能FoSWT对TSR的功效更大,而对RaSWT观察到相反的结果。 ESWT对KSTD患者的TSR,疼痛减轻和ROM恢复具有总体作用。冲击波类型和应用水平对KSTD的治疗效果有不同的贡献,必须进一步研究以在临床实践中优化这些治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号