首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >Assessment of visual fixation in vegetative and minimally conscious states
【24h】

Assessment of visual fixation in vegetative and minimally conscious states

机译:在营养和最低意识状态下视觉注视的评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Visual fixation plays a key role in the differentiation between vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness (VS/UWS) syndrome and minimally conscious state (MCS). However, the use of different stimuli changes the frequency of visual fixation occured in patients, thereby possibly affecting the accuracy of the diagnosis. In order to establish a standardized assessment of visual fixation in patients in disorders of consciousness (DOC), we compared the frequency of visual fixation elicited by mirror,a ball and a light. Method Visual fixation was assessed in eighty-one post-comatose patients diagnosed with a MCS or VS/UWS. Occurrence of fixation to different stimuli was analysis used Chi-square testing. Result 40 (49%) out of the 81 patients showed fixation to visual stimuli. Among those, significantly more patients (39, 48%) had visual fixation elicited by mirror compared to a ball (23, 28%) and mirror compared to a light (20, 25%). Conclusion The use of a mirror during the assessment of visual fixation showed higher positive response rate, compared to other stimuli in eliciting a visual fixating response. Therefore, fixation elicited by a mirror can be a very sensitive and accurate test to differentiate the two disorders of consciousness.
机译:背景视觉注视在植物人状态/无反应性清醒(VS / UWS)综合征和最低意识状态(MCS)之间的区分中起关键作用。但是,使用不同的刺激会改变患者发生视力固定的频率,从而可能影响诊断的准确性。为了建立意识障碍(DOC)患者视觉固定的标准化评估,我们比较了镜子,球和灯引起的视觉固定的频率。方法对八十一名昏迷后诊断为MCS或VS / UWS的患者进行视力评估。使用卡方检验分析对不同刺激物的固定情况。结果81例患者中有40例(49%)显示出对视觉刺激的固定。在这些患者中,与球(23%,28%)相比,镜子引起的视力明显高于球(23%,28%),而与镜子相比(20%,25%)。结论与其他刺激引起的视觉固定反应相比,在视觉固定评估中使用镜子显示出更高的阳性反应率。因此,由镜子引起的注视可能是区分两种意识障碍的非常敏感和准确的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号