首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546]
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546]

机译:显微内窥镜椎间盘切除术与常规开放式椎间盘切除术在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中的成本效益:一项前瞻性随机对照试验[ISRCTN51857546]

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Open discectomy is the standard surgical procedure in the treatment of patients with long-lasting sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. Minimally invasive approaches such as microendoscopic discectomy have gained attention in recent years. Reduced tissue trauma allows early ambulation, short hospital stay and quick resumption of daily activities. A comparative cost-effectiveness study has not been performed yet. We present the design of a randomised controlled trial on cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods/Design Patients (age 18–70 years) presenting with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation lasting more than 6–8 weeks are included. Patients with disc herniation larger than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter, or disc herniation less than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter with concomitant lateral recess stenosis or sequestration, are eliglible for participation. Randomisation into microendoscopic discectomy or conventional unilateral transflaval discectomy will take place in the operating room after induction of anesthesia. The length of skin incision is equal in both groups. The primary outcome measure is the functional assessment of the patient, measured by the Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, at 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery. We will also evaluate several other outcome parameters, including perceived recovery, leg and back pain, incidence of re-operations, complications, serum creatine kinase, quality of life, medical consumption, absenteeism and costs. The study is a randomised prospective multi-institutional trial, in which two surgical techniques are compared in a parallel group design. Patients and research nurses are kept blinded of the allocated treatment during the follow-up period of 2 years. Discussion Currently, open discectomy is the golden standard in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Whether microendoscopic discectomy is more cost-effective than unilateral transflaval discectomy has to be determined by this trial.
机译:背景技术开放式椎间盘切除术是治疗由腰椎间盘突出症引起的长期坐骨神经痛的标准手术方法。近年来,诸如微内镜椎间盘切除术之类的微创方法已引起关注。减少的组织创伤使患者能够及早行动,缩短住院时间并快速恢复日常活动。尚未进行成本效益比较研究。我们提出了一项关于腰椎间盘突出症患者微内镜椎间盘切除术与常规开放式椎间盘切除术的成本效益的随机对照试验设计。方法/设计纳入因腰椎间盘突出症持续超过6-8周而出现坐骨神经痛的患者(年龄18-70岁)。椎间盘突出症大于椎管直径的1/3或椎间盘突出症小于椎管直径的1/3并伴有侧隐窝狭窄或隔离的患者,均可参加。麻醉诱导后,将在手术室中随机分为显微内窥镜椎间盘切除术或常规的单侧经黄斑椎间盘切除术。两组的皮肤切口长度相等。主要结局指标是对患者的功能评估,该评估是由Roland坐骨神经痛残疾问卷在手术后8周和1年进行的。我们还将评估其他几个结局参数,包括感觉到的康复,腿部和背部疼痛,再次手术的发生率,并发症,血清肌酸激酶,生活质量,医疗消耗,旷工和费用。这项研究是一项随机的前瞻性多机构试验,其中在平行组设计中比较了两种手术技术。在2年的随访期内,患者和研究护士对分配的治疗不知情。讨论当前,开放式椎间盘切除术是腰椎间盘突出症手术治疗的黄金标准。这项试验必须确定微内镜椎间盘切除术是否比单侧经黄韧带椎间盘切除术更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号