...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >TOIB Study. Are topical or oral ibuprofen equally effective for the treatment of chronic knee pain presenting in primary care: a randomised controlled trial with patient preference study. [ISRCTN79353052]
【24h】

TOIB Study. Are topical or oral ibuprofen equally effective for the treatment of chronic knee pain presenting in primary care: a randomised controlled trial with patient preference study. [ISRCTN79353052]

机译:TOIB研究。外用或口服布洛芬对初级保健中出现的慢性膝关节疼痛是否同样有效:一项患者偏好研究的随机对照试验。 [ISRCTN79353052]

获取原文

摘要

Background Many older people have chronic knee pain. Both topical and oral non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to treat this. Oral NSAIDS are effective, at least in the short term, but can have severe adverse effects. Topical NSAIDs also appear to be effective, at least in the short term. One might expect topical NSAIDs both to be less effective and to have fewer adverse effects than oral NSAIDs. If topical NSAIDs have fewer adverse effects this may outweigh both the reduction in effectiveness and the higher cost of topical compared to oral treatment. Patient preferences may influence the comparative effectiveness of drugs delivered via different routes. Methods TOIB is a randomised trial comparing topical and oral ibuprofen, with a parallel patient preference study. We are recruiting people aged 50 or over with chronic knee pain, from 27 MRC General Practice Research Framework practices across the UK. We are seeking to recruit 283 participants to the RCT and 379 to the PPS. Participants will be followed up for up to two years (with the majority reaching one year). Outcomes will be assessed by postal questionnaire, nurse examination, laboratory tests and medical record searches at one and two years or the end of the study. Discussion This study will provide new evidence on the overall costs and benefits of treating chronic knee pain with either oral or topical ibuprofen. The use of a patient preference design is unusual, but will allow us to explore how preference influences response to a medication. In addition, it will provide more information on adverse events. This study will provide evidence to inform primary care practitioners, and possibly influence practice.
机译:背景技术许多老年人患有慢性膝关节疼痛。局部和口服非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通常用于治疗该病。口服NSAIDS至少在短期内有效,但会产生严重的不良反应。至少在短期内,局部NSAID似乎也有效。人们可能希望局部使用NSAID比口服NSAID疗效差,副作用小。如果局部NSAIDs不良反应较少,则与口服治疗相比,其有效性的降低和局部成本的增加都可能会更大。患者的偏好可能会影响通过不同途径递送的药物的相对有效性。方法TOIB是一项随机试验,比较了局部和口服布洛芬与一项平行的患者偏爱研究。我们正在从英国的27个MRC通用实践研究框架实践中招募50岁以上患有慢性膝关节疼痛的人。我们正在寻求招募RCT的283名参与者和PPS的379名参与者。参与者将接受长达两年的随访(大多数随访为一年)。在研究的第一年或第二年或结束时,将通过邮政问卷,护士检查,实验室检查和病历搜索来评估结果。讨论本研究将为口服或局部布洛芬治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的总体成本和收益提供新证据。患者偏好设计的使用是不寻常的,但它将使我们能够探索偏好如何影响对药物的反应。此外,它将提供有关不良事件的更多信息。这项研究将为初级保健从业者提供信息,并可能影响实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号