首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >“Blue flags”, development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - a validation study in primary care
【24h】

“Blue flags”, development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - a validation study in primary care

机译:“蓝旗”,有关工作相关的社会心理风险因素的简短临床调查表的开发-初级保健中的验证研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Working conditions substantially influence health, work ability and sick leave. Useful instruments to help clinicians pay attention to working conditions are lacking in primary care (PC). The aim of this study was to test the validity of a short “Blue flags” questionnaire, which focuses on work-related psychosocial risk factors and any potential need for contacts and/or actions at the workplace. From the original“The General Nordic Questionnaire” (QPSNordic) the research group identified five content areas with a total of 51 items which were considered to be most relevant focusing on work-related psychosocial risk factors. Fourteen items were selected from the identified QPSNordic content areas and organised in a short questionnaire “Blue flags”. These 14 items were validated towards the 51 QPSNordic items. Content validity was reviewed by a professional panel and a patient panel. Structural and concurrent validity were also tested within a randomised clinical trial. The two panels (n?=?111) considered the 14 psychosocial items to be relevant. A four-factor model was extracted with an explained variance of 25.2%, 14.9%, 10.9% and 8.3% respectively. All 14 items showed satisfactory loadings on all factors. Concerning concurrent validity the overall correlation was very strong rs?=?0.87 (p?
机译:工作条件严重影响健康,工作能力和病假。初级保健(PC)缺乏帮助临床医生注意工作条件的有用工具。这项研究的目的是测试简短的“蓝旗”问卷的有效性,该问卷侧重于与工作相关的社会心理风险因素以及在工作场所进行接触和/或行动的任何潜在需求。研究小组从最初的“北欧一般问卷”(QPSNordic)中确定了五个内容领域,共有51个项目,被认为与工作相关的社会心理风险因素最相关。从已识别的QPSNordic内容区域中选择了14个项目,并在简短的问卷“蓝旗”中进行了组织。这14个项目已针对51个QPSNordic项目进行了验证。内容的有效性由专业小组和患者小组进行了审查。在一项随机临床试验中还测试了结构和并行有效性。两个小组(n = 111)认为14个社会心理项目是相关的。提取了四因子模型,其解释方差分别为25.2%,14.9%,10.9%和8.3%。所有14个项目在所有因素上均显示令人满意的负载。关于并发有效性,总体相关性非常强,rs?=?0.87(p?<?0.001)。因子1的相关系数为rs?=?0.62(p?<?0.001),因子2的相关性为rs?=?0.74(p?<?0.001)。因子3和因子4较弱,bur仍较合理,且分别为rs?=?0.53(p?<?0.001)和rs?=?0.41(p?<?0.001)。整个“蓝旗”的内部一致性很好,Cronbach的alpha为0.76。在开发“蓝旗”问卷的第一步中,其内容,结构和并发有效性均令人满意。总之,总体有效性被认为是可以接受的。建议在临床环境和其他患者人群中进行测试,以确保可预测的有效性和有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号