首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >The effect of an internet option and single-sided printing format to increase the response rate to a population-based study: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

The effect of an internet option and single-sided printing format to increase the response rate to a population-based study: a randomized controlled trial

机译:互联网选项和单面打印格式对基于人群的研究的答复率提高的效果:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Paper questionnaires are a common means to collect self-reported information in population-based epidemiological studies. Over the past decades, the response rates to epidemiological studies have been decreasing which can affect the selection process of eligible subjects and lead to non-response bias. Hence, research into strategies to increase questionnaire response rates is crucial. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the effectiveness of single-sided questionnaires and an internet option for response in increasing response rates to a population-based study. Methods A 2×2 factorial experiment was embedded within a large population-based study of pain and pain management. Persons in the study sample were 4600 residents in Grampian (north of Scotland) aged 25?years and over who were randomly selected from health board records. Sampled persons were randomly assigned to either receive a single-sided or double-sided questionnaire with or without an internet option to respond. The study questionnaire was distributed via post. Results The overall study response rate was 36.3%. When compared to the reference group that received no intervention (response rate?=?35.5%), the response rate changed only marginally when single-sided questionnaires were distributed (35.8%) or when an option to reply via the internet was provided (34.3%). A somewhat higher increase in response rates was achieved when both strategies were employed (39.6%). Overall, no significant effect on response rate was determined for each strategy or their interaction. Conclusions Evidence from this study suggests that neither single-sided questionnaires nor the option to reply via the internet resulted in a significant increase in response rates to population-based studies.
机译:背景调查表是在基于人群的流行病学研究中收集自我报告信息的常用方法。在过去的几十年中,对流行病学研究的反应率一直在下降,这可能会影响合格受试者的选择过程,并导致无反应的偏见。因此,研究提高问卷答复率的策略至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是探索单面问卷和互联网选项在提高基于人群的研究的回应率方面的有效性。方法将2×2阶乘实验嵌入到基于人群的大型疼痛和疼痛管理研究中。研究样本中有4600位25岁及以上的格兰屏(苏格兰北部)居民,他们是从卫生局记录中随机选择的。抽样人员被随机分配接受单面或双面调查表,无论是否具有互联网选项进行回答。研究问卷通过邮寄方式分发。结果总体研究应答率为36.3%。与未接受干预的参考组相比(答复率?=?35.5%),当分发单面问卷(35.8%)或提供通过互联网进行答复的选项时(34.3%),答复率仅略有变化。 %)。当两种策略都被采用时,响应率增加了一些(39.6%)。总体而言,对于每种策略或其交互作用,未确定对响应率的显着影响。结论该研究的证据表明,单方面的问卷调查和通过互联网答复的选择均不会导致基于人群的研究的答复率显着提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号