首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis
【24h】

The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis

机译:世界卫生组织残疾评估表12(WHO-DAS II)的12个项目:非参数项目响应分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Previous studies have analyzed the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) using classical omnibus measures of scale quality. These analyses are sample dependent and do not model item responses as a function of the underlying trait level. The main objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the WHO-DAS II items and their options in discriminating between changes in the underlying disability level by means of item response analyses. We also explored differential item functioning (DIF) in men and women. Methods The participants were 3615 adult general practice patients from 17 regions of Spain, with a first diagnosed major depressive episode. The 12-item WHO-DAS II was administered by the general practitioners during the consultation. We used a non-parametric item response method (Kernel-Smoothing) implemented with the TestGraf software to examine the effectiveness of each item (item characteristic curves) and their options (option characteristic curves) in discriminating between changes in the underliying disability level. We examined composite DIF to know whether women had a higher probability than men of endorsing each item. Results Item response analyses indicated that the twelve items forming the WHO-DAS II perform very well. All items were determined to provide good discrimination across varying standardized levels of the trait. The items also had option characteristic curves that showed good discrimination, given that each increasing option became more likely than the previous as a function of increasing trait level. No gender-related DIF was found on any of the items. Conclusions All WHO-DAS II items were very good at assessing overall disability. Our results supported the appropriateness of the weights assigned to response option categories and showed an absence of gender differences in item functioning.
机译:背景技术以前的研究已经使用经典的综合量表对量表质量进行了分析,分析了世界卫生组织《残疾评估表II》(WHO-DAS II)的心理计量学特性。这些分析取决于样本,并且不会根据基本特征级别对项目响应进行建模。这项研究的主要目的是通过项目反应分析来检查WHO-DAS II项目及其在区分潜在残障水平变化中的选择的有效性。我们还探讨了男性和女性的差异项功能(DIF)。方法参与者是来自西班牙17个地区的3615名成人全科患者,首次诊断为重度抑郁发作。会诊期间,全科医生管理了12个项目的WHO-DAS II。我们使用通过TestGraf软件实施的非参数项目响应方法(内核平滑)来检查每个项目(项目特征曲线)及其选项(选项特征曲线)在区分潜在残障程度变化方面的有效性。我们检查了复合DIF,以了解女性是否比男性认可每个项目的可能性更高。结果项目响应分析表明,构成WHO-DAS II的12个项目表现良好。确定所有项目在不同的标准化特征水平上提供良好的区分。这些项目还具有显示出良好辨别力的期权特征曲线,因为每个增加的期权比以前的期权更有可能作为增加特征水平的函数。在任何项目中均未找到与性别相关的DIF。结论所有WHO-DAS II项目都非常擅长评估整体残疾。我们的结果支持分配给响应选项类别的权重的适当性,并表明在项目功能上不存在性别差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号