首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Reference effect measures for quantifying, comparing and visualizing variation from random and fixed effects in non-normal multilevel models, with applications to site variation in medical procedure use and outcomes
【24h】

Reference effect measures for quantifying, comparing and visualizing variation from random and fixed effects in non-normal multilevel models, with applications to site variation in medical procedure use and outcomes

机译:用于量化,比较和可视化非正常多级模型中随机效应和固定效应的变异的参考效应量度,并应用于医疗程序使用和结果的部位变异

获取原文
           

摘要

Multilevel models for non-normal outcomes are widely used in medical and health sciences research. While methods for interpreting fixed effects are well-developed, methods to quantify and interpret random cluster variation and compare it with other sources of variation are less established. Random cluster variation, sometimes referred to as general contextual effects (GCE), may be the main focus of a study; therefore, easily interpretable methods are needed to quantify GCE. We propose a Reference Effect Measure (REM) approach to 1) quantify GCE and compare it to individual subject and cluster covariate effects, and 2) quantify relative magnitudes of GCE and variation from sets of measured factors. To illustrate REM, we consider a two-level mixed logistic model with patients clustered within hospitals and a random intercept for hospitals. We compare patients at hospitals at given percentiles of the estimated random effect distribution to patients at a median or ‘reference’ hospital. These estimates are then compared numerically and graphically to individual fixed effects to quantify GCE in the context of effects of other measured variables (aim 1). We then extend this approach by comparing variation from the random effect distribution to variation from sets of fixed effects to understand their magnitudes relative to overall outcome variation (aim 2). Using an example of initiation of rhythm control treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients within the Veterans Affairs (VA), we use REM to demonstrate that random variation across hospitals (GCE) in initiation of treatment is substantially greater than that due to most individual patient factors, and explains at least as much variation in treatment initiation as do all patient factors combined. These results are contrasted with a relatively small GCE compared with patient factors in 1?year mortality following hospitalization for AF patients. REM provides a means of quantifying random effect variation (GCE) with multilevel data and can be used to explore drivers of outcome variation. This method is easily interpretable and can be presented visually. REM offers a simple, interpretable approach for evaluating questions of growing importance in the study of health care systems.
机译:非正常结果的多级模型已广泛用于医学和健康科学研究。尽管解释固定效应的方法已经很成熟,但量化和解释随机聚类变异并将其与其他变异来源进行比较的方法却很少建立。随机聚类变异(有时称为一般情境效应(GCE))可能是研究的重点;因此,需要易于解释的方法来量化GCE。我们提出一种参考效应度量(REM)方法,以1)量化GCE并将其与个体受试者和集群协变量效应进行比较,以及2)量化GCE的相对大小和各组测量因子的变化。为了说明REM,我们考虑了一个两级混合逻辑模型,其中患者聚集在医院内,医院随机拦截。我们将给定随机效果分布的给定百分数的医院患者与中位或“参考”医院的患者进行比较。然后,将这些估计值在数字和图形上与单独的固定效应进行比较,以便在其他测量变量的效应范围内对GCE进行量化(目标1)。然后,我们通过比较随机效应分布的变化与固定效应集的变化来扩展此方法,以了解其相对于总体结果变化的幅度(目标2)。以退伍军人事务部(VA)内房颤(AF)患者开始节律控制治疗为例,我们使用REM来证明治疗开始时各医院(GCE)的随机差异远大于大多数人造成的病人因素,并解释至少与所有病人因素组合起来一样多的治疗开始差异。与房颤患者住院1年死亡率相比,GCE与患者因素相比,GCE相对较小。 REM提供了一种利用多级数据量化随机效应变异(GCE)的方法,可用于探索结果变异的驱动因素。这种方法很容易解释,并且可以直观呈现。 REM提供了一种简单易懂的方法来评估在卫生保健系统研究中日益重要的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号