...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medicine >A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
【24h】

A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study

机译:一项集群随机试验,评估中风患者临床途径的效果:有效且适当的护理研究的临床途径的结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Clinical pathways (CPs) are used to improve the outcomes of acute stroke, but their use in stroke care is questionable, because the evidence on their effectiveness is still inconclusive. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether CPs improve the outcomes and the quality of care provided to patients after acute ischemic stroke. Methods This was a multicentre cluster-randomized trial, in which 14 hospitals were randomized to the CP arm or to the non intervention/usual care (UC) arm. Healthcare workers in the CP arm received 3 days of training in quality improvement of CPs and in use of a standardized package including information on evidence-based key interventions and indicators. Healthcare workers in the usual-care arm followed their standard procedures. The teams in the CP arm developed their CPs over a 6-month period. The primary end point was mortality. Secondary end points were: use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, implementation of organized care, length of stay, re-admission and institutionalization rates after discharge, dependency levels, and complication rates. Results Compared with the patients in the UC arm, the patients in the CP arm had a significantly lower risk of mortality at 7 days (OR = 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.95) and significantly lower rates of adverse functional outcomes, expressed as the odds of not returning to pre-stroke functioning in their daily life (OR = 0.42; 95 CI 0.18 to 0.98). There was no significant effect on 30-day mortality. Compared with the UC arm, the hospital diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed more appropriately in the CP arm, and the evidence-based key interventions and organized care were more applied in the CP arm. Conclusions CPs can significantly improve the outcomes of patients with ischemic patients with stroke, indicating better application of evidence-based key interventions and of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This study tested a new hypothesis and provided evidence on how CPs can work. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: [ NCT00673491 ].
机译:背景技术临床途径(CPs)用于改善急性中风的预后,但在中风护理中的应用尚存疑问,因为其有效性的证据尚无定论。这项研究的目的是评估CPs是否能改善急性缺血性中风后的结局以及为患者提供的护理质量。方法这是一项多中心集群随机试验,其中14家医院被随机分为CP组或非干预/常规护理(UC)组。 CP部门的医护人员接受了为期3天的CP质量提高培训和使用标准化程序包的培训,其中包括基于证据的关键干预措施和指标的信息。通常护理部门的医护人员遵循其标准程序。 CP团队的团队在6个月的时间内开发了CP。主要终点是死亡率。次要终点是:使用诊断和治疗程序,实施有组织的护理,住院时间,出院后再次入院和住院率,依赖性水平和并发症发生率。结果与UC组相比,CP组在7天时的死亡风险显着降低(OR = 0.10; 95%CI 0.01至0.95),并且不良功能发生率显着降低,表示为在日常生活中不恢复中风的机率(OR = 0.42; 95 CI 0.18至0.98)。对30天死亡率没有明显影响。与UC部门相比,CP部门的医院诊断和治疗程序更合适,CP部门更采用循证的关键干预措施和有组织的护理。结论CPs可以显着改善缺血性脑卒中患者的预后,表明更好地应用基于证据的关键干预措施以及诊断和治疗程序。这项研究检验了一个新的假设,并提供了有关CP如何工作的证据。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov ID:[NCT00673491]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号