...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Determining the date of diagnosis – is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care
【24h】

Determining the date of diagnosis – is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care

机译:确定诊断日期–这很简单吗?在英国的初级保健中,不同的约会诊断方法对卵巢癌延误治疗估计的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Studies of cancer incidence and early management will increasingly draw on routine electronic patient records. However, data may be incomplete or inaccurate. We developed a generalisable strategy for investigating presenting symptoms and delays in diagnosis using ovarian cancer as an example. Methods The General Practice Research Database was used to investigate the time between first report of symptom and diagnosis of 344 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 01/06/2002 and 31/05/2008. Effects of possible inaccuracies in dating of diagnosis on the frequencies and timing of the most commonly reported symptoms were investigated using four increasingly inclusive definitions of first diagnosis/suspicion: 1. "Definite diagnosis" 2. "Ambiguous diagnosis" 3. "First treatment or complication suggesting pre-existing diagnosis", 4 "First relevant test or referral". Results The most commonly coded symptoms before a definite diagnosis of ovarian cancer, were abdominal pain (41%), urogenital problems(25%), abdominal distension (24%), constipation/change in bowel habits (23%) with 70% of cases reporting at least one of these. The median time between first reporting each of these symptoms and diagnosis was 13, 21, 9.5 and 8.5 weeks respectively. 19% had a code for definitions 2 or 3 prior to definite diagnosis and 73% a code for 4. However, the proportion with symptoms and the delays were similar for all four definitions except 4, where the median delay was 8, 8, 3, 10 and 0 weeks respectively. Conclusion Symptoms recorded in the General Practice Research Database are similar to those reported in the literature, although their frequency is lower than in studies based on self-report. Generalisable strategies for exploring the impact of recording practice on date of diagnosis in electronic patient records are recommended, and studies which date diagnoses in GP records need to present sensitivity analyses based on investigation, referral and diagnosis data. Free text information may be essential in obtaining accurate estimates of incidence, and for accurate dating of diagnoses.
机译:癌症发病率和早期治疗的背景研究将越来越多地利用常规的电子患者记录。但是,数据可能不完整或不准确。我们开发了一个可概括的策略,以卵巢癌为例来研究症状和诊断延迟。方法使用全科医学研究数据库调查2002年6月1日至2008年5月31日期间344例被诊断为卵巢癌的女性从首次报告症状到确诊之间的时间。使用首次诊断/怀疑的四个越来越广泛的定义,研究了诊断日期可能不准确对最常报告的症状的发生频率和时间的影响:1.“确定性诊断” 2.“歧义性诊断” 3.“首次治疗或提示已有诊断的并发症”,4“首次相关检查或转诊”。结果在明确诊断卵巢癌之前,最常编码的症状是腹痛(41%),泌尿生殖系统疾病(25%),腹胀(24%),便秘/肠蠕动改变(23%)和70%报告至少其中之一的案件。首次报告这些症状与诊断之间的中位时间分别为13、21、9.5和8.5周。 19%的人在明确诊断之前具有定义2或3的代码,而73%的人具有针对4的代码。但是,除了4个中位数延迟分别为8、8、3以外,所有四个定义的症状和延迟比例均相似。 ,分别为10周和0周。结论通用实践研究数据库中记录的症状与文献报道的症状相似,尽管其发生频率低于基于自我报告的研究。建议采用通用策略来探索记录实践对电子病历中诊断日期的影响,并且在GP记录中诊断日期的研究需要基于调查,转诊和诊断数据提出敏感性分析。自由文本信息对于获得准确的发病率估计和准确的诊断日期可能至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号