首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research >Practices and ethical concerns regarding preimplantation diagnosis. Who regulates preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Brazil?
【24h】

Practices and ethical concerns regarding preimplantation diagnosis. Who regulates preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Brazil?

机译:有关植入前诊断的实践和道德问题。谁来规范巴西的植入前基因诊断?

获取原文
           

摘要

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was originally developed to diagnose embryo-related genetic abnormalities for couples who present a high risk of a specific inherited disorder. Because this technology involves embryo selection, the medical, bioethical, and legal implications of the technique have been debated, particularly when it is used to select features that are not related to serious diseases. Although several initiatives have attempted to achieve regulatory harmonization, the diversity of healthcare services available and the presence of cultural differences have hampered attempts to achieve this goal. Thus, in different countries, the provision of PGD and regulatory frameworks reflect the perceptions of scientific groups, legislators, and society regarding this technology. In Brazil, several texts have been analyzed by the National Congress to regulate the use of assisted reproduction technologies. Legislative debates, however, are not conclusive, and limited information has been published on how PGD is specifically regulated. The country requires the development of new regulatory standards to ensure adequate access to this technology and to guarantee its safe practice. This study examined official documents published on PGD regulation in Brazil and demonstrated how little direct oversight of PGD currently exists. It provides relevant information to encourage reflection on a particular regulation model in a Brazilian context, and should serve as part of the basis to enable further reform of the clinical practice of PGD in the country.
机译:植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)最初是为患有特定遗传性疾病风险较高的夫妇诊断与胚胎相关的遗传异常。由于该技术涉及胚胎的选择,因此对该技术的医学,生物伦理和法律意义进行了辩论,特别是当该技术用于选择与严重疾病无关的特征时。尽管已经尝试了多种举措来实现监管的统一,但是可用的医疗保健服务的多样性以及文化差异的存在阻碍了实现这一目标的尝试。因此,在不同的国家/地区,PGD的提供和监管框架反映了科学团体,立法者和社会对该技术的看法。在巴西,国民议会已经分析了若干文本,以规范辅助生殖技术的使用。但是,立法辩论不是结论性的,有关PGD如何具体监管的信息也很少。该国要求制定新的监管标准,以确保充分利用该技术并确保其安全实践。这项研究检查了巴西有关PGD法规发布的官方文件,并证明了目前对PGD的直接监督很少。它提供了相关信息,以鼓励人们在巴西环境下对特定的监管模式进行反思,并且应作为基础的一部分,以使该国PGD的临床实践进一步改革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号