...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases >Evaluation of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid versus ceftriaxone plus amikacin for fever and neutropenia in pediatric patients with leukemia and lymphoma
【24h】

Evaluation of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid versus ceftriaxone plus amikacin for fever and neutropenia in pediatric patients with leukemia and lymphoma

机译:替卡西林/克拉维酸与头孢曲松钠联合丁胺卡那霉素对小儿白血病和淋巴瘤患者发烧和中性粒细胞减少的评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The empirical use of antibiotic treatments is widely accepted as a means to treat cancer patients in chemotherapy who have fever and neutropenia. Intravenous monotherapy, with broad spectrum antibiotics, of patients with a high risk of complications is a possible alternative. METHODS: We conducted a prospective open-label, randomized study of patients with lymphoma or leukemia who had fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy. Patients received either monotherapy with ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (T) or ceftriaxone plus amikacin (C+A). RESULTS: Seventy patients who presented 136 episodes were evaluated, 68 in each arm of the study. The mean neutrophil counts at admission were 217cells/mm3 (T) and 201cells/mm3 (C+A). The mean duration of neutropenia was 8.7 days (T) and 7.6 days (C+A). Treatment was successful without the need for modifications in 71% of the episodes in the T group and 81% in the C+A group (p=0.23). Treatment was considered to have failed because of death in two episodes (3%) in the T group and three episodes (4%) in the C+A group, and because of a change in the drug applied in one episode in the T group and two episodes in the C+A group. Overall success was 96% (T) and 93% (C+A). Adverse events that occurred in group T were not related to the drugs used in this study. CONCLUSION: In pediatric and adolescent patients with leukemia or lymphoma, who presented with fever and neutropenia, during chemotherapy, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid was as successful as the combination of ceftriaxone plus amikacin. It should be considered an appropriate option for this group of patients at high risk for infections.
机译:背景:经验性使用抗生素治疗被认为是治疗发烧和中性粒细胞减少症的化疗癌症患者的一种手段。对于具有高并发症风险的患者,静脉内单药治疗和广谱抗生素治疗是一种可能的选择。方法:我们对化疗期间发烧和中性粒细胞减少的淋巴瘤或白血病患者进行了一项前瞻性开放标签随机研究。患者接受了替卡西林/克拉维酸(T)或头孢曲松加阿米卡星(C + A)的单药治疗。结果:评估了70例136次发作的患者,每组研究68例。入院时中性粒细胞平均计数为217cells / mm3(T)和201cells / mm3(C + A)。中性粒细胞减少症的平均持续时间为8.7天(T)和7.6天(C + A)。治疗成功,无需改变T组71%的发作和C + A组81%的发作(p = 0.23)。 T组因两次发作(3%)死亡和C + A组三个发作(4%)死亡,以及T组一次发作所用药物的改变,被认为治疗失败和C + A组中的两集。总体成功率为96%(T)和93%(C + A)。 T组发生的不良事件与本研究中使用的药物无关。结论:在化疗期间出现发烧和中性粒细胞减少的儿童和青少年白血病或淋巴瘤患者,替卡西林/克拉维酸与头孢曲松钠联合丁胺卡那霉素的治疗一样成功。对于这组高感染风险的患者,应考虑将其作为一种适当的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号