首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases >Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
【24h】

Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples

机译:同时检测临床样本中脑膜炎奈瑟菌,流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌的基于PCR的方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Several in-house PCR-based assays have been described for the detection of bacterial meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae from clinical samples. PCR-based methods targeting different bacterial genes are frequently used by different laboratories worldwide, but no standard method has ever been established. The aim of our study was to compare different in-house and a commercial PCR-based tests for the detection of bacterial pathogens causing meningitis and invasive disease in humans. Methods A total of 110 isolates and 134 clinical samples (99 cerebrospinal fluid and 35 blood samples) collected from suspected cases of invasive disease were analyzed. Specific sets of primers frequently used for PCR-diagnosis of the three pathogens were used and compared with the results achieved using the multiplex approach described here. Several different gene targets were used for each microorganism, namely ctrA, crgA and nspA for N. meningitidis, ply for S. pneumoniae, P6 and bexA for H. influenzae. Results All used methods were fast, specific and sensitive, while some of the targets used for the in-house PCR assay detected lower concentrations of genomic DNA than the commercial method. An additional PCR reaction is described for the differentiation of capsulated and non-capsulated H. influenzae strains, the while commercial method only detects capsulated strains. Conclusions The in-house PCR methods here compared showed to be rapid, sensitive, highly specific, and cheaper than commercial methods. The in-house PCR methods could be easily adopted by public laboratories of developing countries for diagnostic purposes. The best results were achieved using primers targeting the genes nspA, ply, and P6 which were able to detect the lowest DNA concentrations for each specific target.
机译:背景技术已经描述了几种基于PCR的内部测定法,用于从临床样品中检测由脑膜炎奈瑟氏球菌,肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌引起的细菌性脑膜炎。全球各地不同实验室经常使用针对不同细菌基因的基于PCR的方法,但尚未建立标准方法。我们研究的目的是比较不同的内部和基于商业PCR的检测方法,以检测引起人类脑膜炎和浸润性疾病的细菌病原体。方法对疑似浸润性疾病病例的110份分离株和134份临床样本(99份脑脊液和35份血液样本)进行分析。使用了经常用于三种病原体的PCR诊断的特定引物组,并将其与使用此处所述的多重方法获得的结果进行比较。每种微生物使用了几种不同的基因靶标,即脑膜炎奈瑟氏球菌为ctrA,crgA和nspA,肺炎链球菌为ply,流感嗜血杆菌为p6和bexA。结果所有使用的方法都是快速,特异性和灵敏的,而用于内部PCR分析的一些目标检测到的基因组DNA浓度低于商业方法。描述了用于区分封装的和非封装的流感嗜血杆菌菌株的另外的PCR反应,而商业方法仅检测封装的菌株。结论这里比较的内部PCR方法显示出比商业方法更快速,灵敏,高度特异性且便宜。内部PCR方法很容易被发展中国家的公共实验室用于诊断目的。使用针对基因nspA,ply和P6的引物能够获得最佳结果,该引物能够检测每个特定靶标的最低DNA浓度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号