首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery >Validation of Four Prediction Scores for Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Chinese Patients
【24h】

Validation of Four Prediction Scores for Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Chinese Patients

机译:中国患者心脏手术相关急性肾脏损伤的四个预测评分的验证

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Objective: To assess the clinical value of four models for the prediction of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) and severe AKI which renal replacement therapy was needed (RRT-AKI) in Chinese patients. Methods: 1587 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in the department of cardiac surgery in the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between January 2013 and December 2013 were enrolled in this research. Evaluating the predicting value for cardiac surgery-associated AKI (AKICS score) and RRT-AKI (Cleveland score, SRI and Mehta score) by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for the calibration and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the discrimination. Results: Based on 2012 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) AKI definition, the incidence of AKI and RRT-AKI was 37.4% (594/1587) and 1.1% (18/1587), respectively. The mortality of AKI and RRT-AKI was 6.1% (36/594) and 66.7% (12/18), respectively, while the total mortality was 2.8% (44/1587). The discrimination (AUROC=0.610) for the prediction of CSA-AKI of AKICS was low, while the calibration (x2=7.55, P=0.109) was fair. For the prediction of RRT-AKI, the discrimination of Cleveland score (AUROC=0.684), Mehta score (AUROC=0.708) and SRI (AUROC=0.622) were not good; while the calibration of them were fair (Cleveland score x2=1.918, P=0.166; Mehta score x2=9.209, P=0.238; SRI x2=2.976, P=0.271). Conclusion: In our single-center study, based upon valve surgery dominant and less diabetes mellitus patients, according to KDIGO AKI definition, the predictive value of the four models, combining discrimination and calibration, for respective primary event, were not convincible.
机译:摘要目的:评估四种模型对中国患者需要进行肾脏替代治疗(RRT-AKI)的心脏手术相关的急性肾损伤(CSA-AKI)和严重AKI的预测价值。方法:纳入2013年1月至2013年12月在复旦大学附属中山医院心脏外科进行心脏外科手术的1587例患者。通过Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验来评估与心脏手术相关的AKI(AKICS评分)和RRT-AKI(Cleveland评分,SRI和Mehta评分)的预测值,以进行校正和接受者工作特征曲线(AUROC)下的面积对于歧视。结果:根据2012年KDIGO(肾脏疾病:改善全球疗效)AKI定义,AKI和RRT-AKI的发生率分别为37.4%(594/1587)和1.1%(18/1587)。 AKI和RRT-AKI的死亡率分别为6.1%(36/594)和66.7%(12/18),而总死亡率为2.8%(44/1587)。预测AKICS的CSA-AKI的分辨力(AUROC = 0.610)低,而校准(x2 = 7.55,P = 0.109)则很合理。对于RRT-AKI的预测,克利夫兰评分(AUROC = 0.684),Mehta评分(AUROC = 0.708)和SRI(AUROC = 0.622)的区分度不佳。而它们的标定是公平的(克利夫兰得分x2 = 1.918,P = 0.166; Mehta得分x2 = 9.209,P = 0.238; SRI x2 = 2.976,P = 0.271)。结论:在我们的单中心研究中,根据瓣膜手术占优势和糖尿病患者较少的情况,根据KDIGO AKI的定义,这四个模型(结合判别和校准)对于各自主要事件的预测价值并不令人信服。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号