首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Protocol for a national audit on self-reported confidence levels, training requirements and current practice among trainee doctors in the UK: The Trainees Own Perception of Delivery of Care in Diabetes (TOPDOC) Study
【24h】

Protocol for a national audit on self-reported confidence levels, training requirements and current practice among trainee doctors in the UK: The Trainees Own Perception of Delivery of Care in Diabetes (TOPDOC) Study

机译:关于英国受训医生自我报告的置信度,培训要求和当前实践的国家审核协议:受训者对糖尿病护理交付的自我认知(TOPDOC)研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background As the incidence and prevalence of diabetes increases across the world, resource pressures require doctors without specialist training to provide care for people with diabetes. In the UK, national standards have been set to ensure quality diabetes care from diagnosis to the management of complications. In a multi-centre pilot study, we have demonstrated a lack of confidence among UK trainee doctors in managing diabetes. Suboptimal confidence was identified in a number of areas, including the management of diabetes emergencies. A national survey would clarify whether the results of our pilot study are representative and reproducible. Methods/Design Target cohort : All postgraduate trainee doctors in the UK. Domains Studied: The self reported online survey questionnaire has 5 domains: (1) confidence levels in the diagnosis and management of diabetes, (2) working with diabetes specialists, (3) perceived adequacy of training in diabetes (4) current practice in optimising glycaemic control and (5) perceived barriers to seeking euglycaemia. Assessment tools : Self-reported confidence is assessed using the 'Confidence Rating' (CR) scale for trainee doctors developed by the Royal College of Physicians. This scale has four points - ('not confident' (CR1), 'satisfactory but lacking confidence' (CR2), 'confident in some cases (CR3) and 'fully confident in most cases' (CR4). Frequency of aspects of day-to-day practice is assessed using a six-point scale. Respondents have a choice of 'always' (100%), 'almost always' (80-99%), 'often' (50-79%), 'not very often' (20-49%) and 'rarely' (5-19%) or never (less than 5%). Discussion It is anticipated that the results of this national study will clarify confidence levels and current practice among trainee doctors in the provision of care for people with diabetes. The responses will inform efforts to enhance postgraduate training in diabetes, potentially improving the quality of care for people with diabetes.
机译:背景技术随着世界各地糖尿病的发病率和患病率增加,资源压力要求医生接受未经专门培训的医生来为糖尿病患者提供护理。在英国,已经制定了国家标准以确保从诊断到并发症管理的高质量糖尿病护理。在一项多中心的先导研究中,我们证明了英国受训医生对糖尿病的治疗缺乏信心。在许多领域,包括糖尿病紧急情况的管理中,人们都发现信心欠佳。一项全国调查将阐明我们的试验研究结果是否具有代表性和可重复性。方法/设计目标人群:英国的所有研究生培训医生。研究领域:自我报告的在线调查问卷包含5个领域:(1)对糖尿病的诊断和管理的置信度;(2)与糖尿病专家的合作;(3)认为糖尿病培训的充分性;(4)当前优化的实践血糖控制和(5)寻求血糖正常的障碍。评估工具:皇家医师学院针对受训医生使用“信心等级”(CR)量表对自我报告的信心进行评估。该量表有四个要点-(“不自信”(CR1),“满意但缺乏信心”(CR2),“在某些情况下自信(CR3)和”在大多数情况下完全自信”(CR4)。日常实践使用六点量表进行评估,受访者可以选择“总是”(100%),“几乎总是”(80-99%),“经常”(50-79%),“不”经常”(20-49%)和“很少”(5-19%)或从不(少于5%)进行讨论预期,这项全国性研究的结果将阐明接受培训的医生的信心水平和当前实践。应对措施将为加强糖尿病研究生培训提供参考,从而有可能提高糖尿病患者的护理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号