首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Overspecialized and undertrained? Patient diversity encountered by medical students during their internal medicine clerkship at a university hospital
【24h】

Overspecialized and undertrained? Patient diversity encountered by medical students during their internal medicine clerkship at a university hospital

机译:过度专业化和训练不足?医学生在大学医院内科工作期间遇到的患者多样性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background During the four-month internal medicine clerkship in their final year, undergraduate medical students are closely involved in patient care. Little is known about what constitutes their typical learning experiences with respect to patient diversity within the different subspecialties of internal medicine and during on call hours. Methods 25 final year medical students (16 female, 9 male) on their internal medicine clerkship participated in this observational single-center study. To detail the patient diversity encountered by medical students at a university hospital during their 16-week internal medicine clerkship, all participants self-reported their patient contacts in the different subspecialties and during on call hours on patient encounter cards. Patients’ chief complaint, suspected main diagnosis, planned diagnostic investigations, and therapy in seven different internal medicine subspecialties and the on call medicine service were documented. Results 496 PECs were analysed in total. The greatest diversity of chief complaints (CC) and suspected main diagnoses (SMD) was observed in patients encountered on call, with the combined frequencies of the three most common CCs or SMDs accounting for only 23% and 25%, respectively. Combined, the three most commonly encountered CC/SMD accounted for high percentages (82%/63%), i.e. less diversity, in oncology and low percentages (37%/32%), i.e. high diversity, in nephrology. The percentage of all diagnostic investigations and therapies that were classified as “basic” differed between the subspecialties from 82%/94% (on call) to 37%/50% (pulmonology/oncology). The only subspecialty with no significant difference compared with on call was nephrology for diagnostic investigations. With respect to therapy, nephrology and infectious diseases showed no significant differences compared with on call. Conclusions Internal medicine clerkships at a university hospital provide students with a very limited patient diversity in most internal medicine subspecialties. Shadowing the on call resident or shorter rotations could provide a more extended patient diversity.
机译:背景在最后一年的四个月内科服务期间,本科医学生密切参与患者护理。关于内科不同亚专业内以及在上班时间内患者多样性的典型学习经历,人们鲜为人知。方法参加这项观察性单中心研究的25名最后一年的医学生(16名女性,9名男性)参加了内部医学业务。为了详细说明大学医院的医学生在他们的16周内部医学业务期间遇到的患者多样性,所有参与者都使用不同的专业来自我报告他们的患者联系方式,以及在患者接诊卡上的通话时间内。记录了患者的主诉,疑似主要诊断,计划中的诊断调查以及在七个不同内科专科中的治疗以及随叫随到的医疗服务。结果共分析了496个PEC。主诉(CC)和疑似主要诊断(SMD)的最大差异是在通话中遇到的患者,三种最常见的CC或SMD的合并频率分别仅占23%和25%。结合起来,三种最常见的CC / SMD占肿瘤学的高百分比(82%/ 63%),即较少的多样性,而在肾脏病学中占较低的百分比(37%/ 32%),即高多样性。在亚专业中,被分类为“基本”的所有诊断研究和治疗的百分比从82%/ 94%(待命)到37%/ 50%(肺病/肿瘤学)不同。与待诊患者相比,唯一没有显着差异的亚专业是肾脏病诊断研究。在治疗方面,肾病学和传染病与召集相比没有显着差异。结论在一家大学医院,内科医师在大多数内科亚专业中为学生提供的患者多样性非常有限。遮蔽待命常驻人员或缩短轮换时间可提供更大范围的患者多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号