首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus trivalent influenza vaccine for elderly in Hong Kong
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus trivalent influenza vaccine for elderly in Hong Kong

机译:香港老年人使用四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗的成本效益分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) versus trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in Hong Kong elderly were estimated over 9 seasons. TIV-unmatched influenza B infection rates with QIV versus TIV were estimated by an epidemiology model. Model parameters included percentages of influenza B lineages in circulation, influenza B-associated hospital admission, age-specific population, vaccine coverage and effectiveness. Incremental cost per QALY gained (ICER) by QIV versus TIV were estimated from Hong Kong’s societal perspective. Mean reduction in influenza B infection rate was 191.3 (95%CI 45.1-337.5) per 100,000 population aged ≥65 years. Highest cost savings and QALYs gained by QIV occurred in 2007 with high percentage of TIV-unmatched strain (92.9%) for age groups 65–79 years (USD266,473 and 22.8 QALYs) and ≥80 years (USD483,461 and 27.3 QALYs). ICERs of QIV were below willingness-to-pay for age group 65–79 years in 6, 5 and 3 years when QIV cost + USD1 + USD2 and + USD5 more than TIV, respectively. For age group ≥80 years, ICERs of QIV were below willingness-to-pay in 7 and 5 years when QIV cost + USD1 and + USD5, correspondingly. Acceptance of QIV to be cost-effective in Hong Kong elderly was subject to QIV unit cost and percentage of circulating TIV-unmatched influenza B lineages.
机译:在香港的老年人中,四价流感疫苗(QIV)与三价流感疫苗(TIV)的成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)估计超过9个季节。通过流行病学模型估算了QIV与TIV相比TIV无与伦比的乙型流感感染率。模型参数包括乙型流感谱系在流通中的百分比,乙型流感相关的住院人数,特定年龄人群,疫苗覆盖率和有效性。从香港的社会角度估计,QIV与TIV相比,每QALY获得的增量成本(ICER)。每100,000个65岁以上的人口中,乙型流感的平均减少率为191.3(95%CI 45.1-337.5)。 QIV获得的最高成本节省和QALY发生在2007年,其中65-79岁年龄段(266,473美元和22.8 QALYs)和≥80岁(483,461美元和27.3 QALYs)的TIV无与伦比菌株的比例很高(92.9%) 。 QIV的ICER在6、5和3年内低于65-79岁年龄组的支付意愿,此时QIV的费用分别比TIV高出1美元,2美元和5美元。对于≥80岁的年龄组,当QIV成本分别为1美元和+5美元时,QIV的ICER在7年和5年内低于支付意愿。在香港老年人中接受QIV的成本效益取决于QIV的单位成本和TIV无与伦比的乙型流感谱系传播的百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号