首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >The efficacy and safety of insulin-sensitizing drugs in HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
【24h】

The efficacy and safety of insulin-sensitizing drugs in HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

机译:胰岛素敏感性药物在HIV相关的脂肪营养不良综合征中的有效性和安全性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome (HALS) is characterized by insulin resistance, abnormal lipid metabolism and redistribution of body fat. To date, there has been no quantitative summary of the effects of insulin sensitizing-agents for the treatment of this challenging problem. Methods We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, conference proceedings and references for randomized trials evaluating rosiglitazone, pioglitazone or metformin in patients with evidence of HALS (last update December 2009). Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality using a standard form. We contacted authors for missing data and calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each outcome. Results Sixteen trials involving 920 patients met inclusion criteria. Rosiglitazone modestly improved fasting insulin (WMD -3.67 mU/L; CI -7.03, -0.31) but worsened triglycerides (WMD 32.5 mg/dL; CI 1.93, 63.1), LDL (WMD 11.33 mg/dL; CI 1.85, 20.82) and HDL (WMD -2.91 mg/dL; CI -4.56, -1.26) when compared to placebo or no treatment in seven trials. Conversely, pioglitazone had no impact on fasting insulin, triglycerides or LDL but improved HDL (WMD 7.60 mg/dL; CI 0.20, 15.0) when compared to placebo in two trials. Neither drug favorably impacted measures of fat redistribution. Based on six trials with placebo or no treatment controls, metformin reduced fasting insulin (WMD -8.94 mU/L; CI -13.0, -4.90), triglycerides (WMD -42.87 mg/dL; CI -73.3, -12.5), body mass index (WMD -0.70 kg/m2; CI -1.09, -0.31) and waist-to-hip ratio (WMD -0.02; CI -0.03, 0.00). Three trials directly compared metformin to rosiglitazone. While effects on insulin were comparable, lipid levels and measures of fat redistribution all favored metformin. Severe adverse events were uncommon in all 16 trials. Conclusion Based on our meta-analysis, rosiglitazone should not be used in HALS. While pioglitazone may be safer, any benefits appear small. Metformin was the only insulin-sensitizer to demonstrate beneficial effects on all three components of HALS.
机译:背景与HIV相关的脂肪营养不良综合征(HALS)的特征是胰岛素抵抗,脂质代谢异常和体内脂肪重新分布。迄今为止,还没有关于胰岛素增敏剂治疗该难题的效果的定量总结。方法我们在MEDLINE,Cochrane图书馆,临床试验登记处,会议记录和参考资料中搜索了评估具有HALS证据的患者中的罗格列酮,吡格列酮或二甲双胍的随机试验(最新信息,2009年12月)。两位审稿人使用标准表格独立提取数据并评估质量。我们联系作者以获取缺少的数据,并为每个结果计算加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果涉及920名患者的16项试验符合纳入标准。罗格列酮适度改善了空腹胰岛素(WMD -3.67 mU / L; CI -7.03,-0.31),但甘油三酸酯(WMD 32.5 mg / dL; CI 1.93,63.1),LDL(WMD 11.33 mg / dL; CI 1.85,20.82)和在7项试验中,与安慰剂或不进行治疗相比,HDL(WMD -2.91 mg / dL; CI -4.56,-1.26)。相反,在两项试验中,吡格列酮对空腹胰岛素,甘油三酸酯或LDL无影响,但改善了HDL(WMD 7.60 mg / dL; CI 0.20,15.0)。两种药物均未对脂肪再分配的措施产生有利影响。根据六项使用安慰剂或无治疗对照的试验,二甲双胍可降低空腹胰岛素(WMD -8.94 mU / L; CI -13.0,-4.90),甘油三酸酯(WMD -42.87 mg / dL; CI -73.3,-12.5),体重指数(WMD -0.70 kg / m 2 ; CI -1.09,-0.31)和腰臀比(WMD -0.02; CI -0.03,0.00)。三项试验直接比较了二甲双胍和罗格列酮。虽然对胰岛素的作用相当,但血脂水平和脂肪重新分布的测定均偏爱二甲双胍。在全部16项试验中,严重不良事件并不常见。结论根据我们的荟萃分析,罗格列酮不宜用于HALS。尽管吡格列酮可能更安全,但任何益处似乎很小。二甲双胍是唯一对HALS的所有三个成分均显示出有益作用的胰岛素敏化剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号