首页> 外文期刊>BMC International Health and Human Rights >What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
【24h】

What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs

机译:增强的健康权能为2015年后的健康发展议程带来什么?:质疑最低限度核心概念在满足全球基本卫生需求方面的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Global health institutions increasingly recognize that the right to health should guide the formulation of replacement goals for the Millennium Development Goals, which expire in 2015. However, the right to health’s contribution is undercut by the principle of progressive realization, which links provision of health services to available resources, permitting states to deny even basic levels of health coverage domestically and allowing international assistance for health to remain entirely discretionary. Discussion To prevent progressive realization from undermining both domestic and international responsibilities towards health, international human rights law institutions developed the idea of non-derogable “minimum core” obligations to provide essential health services. While minimum core obligations have enjoyed some uptake in human rights practice and scholarship, their definition in international law fails to specify which health services should fall within their scope, or to specify wealthy country obligations to assist poorer countries. These definitional gaps undercut the capacity of minimum core obligations to protect essential health needs against inaction, austerity and illegitimate trade-offs in both domestic and global action. If the right to health is to effectively advance essential global health needs in these contexts, weaknesses within the minimum core concept must be resolved through innovative research on social, political and legal conceptualizations of essential health needs. Summary We believe that if the minimum core concept is strengthened in these ways, it will produce a more feasible and grounded conception of legally prioritized health needs that could assist in advancing health equity, including by providing a framework rooted in legal obligations to guide the formulation of new health development goals, providing a baseline of essential health services to be protected as a matter of right against governmental claims of scarcity and inadequate international assistance, and empowering civil society to claim fulfillment of their essential health needs from domestic and global decision-makers.
机译:背景信息全球卫生机构越来越认识到,健康权应指导制定于2015年到期的千年发展目标的替代目标。但是,逐步实现的原则削弱了健康权的贡献,该原则将提供卫生保健与对可用资源的服务,允许各州甚至拒绝在国内提供基本的医疗保健水平,并允许国际上的医疗保健援助完全由人决定。讨论为了防止逐步实现破坏国内和国际对健康的责任,国际人权法机构提出了不可减损的“最低核心”义务,以提供基本的卫生服务。虽然最低限度的核心义务在人权实践和学术研究中已得到一定程度的接受,但在国际法中对最低核心义务的定义并未具体说明哪些医疗服务应属于其范围之内,也未指定富裕国家为贫困国家提供援助的义务。这些定义上的差距削弱了最低限度核心义务保护基本卫生需求的能力,以防止在国内和全球行动中采取不作为,紧缩措施和非法取舍。如果健康权是在这些情况下有效地促进全球基本卫生需求,则必须通过对基本卫生需求的社会,政治和法律概念进行创新研究,解决最低核心概念中的弱点。总结我们认为,如果以这些方式加强最低限度的核心概念,它将产生一个更可行,更扎实的法律上优先的卫生需求的概念,可以帮助促进卫生公平,包括提供一个以法律义务为基础的框架来指导制定制定新的卫生发展目标,提供基本卫生服务的基线,作为一项权利问题得到保护,以免受到政府对资源短缺和国际援助不足的要求,并授权民间社会要求国内和全球决策者满足其基本卫生需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号