首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

机译:腹部开放手术期间的血统变异性指数或中风量优化:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The impact of Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) based on the non-invasive Pleth Variability Index (PVI) on clinical outcome after abdominal surgery has only sparingly been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of intraoperative GDFT guided by PVI to a control group using esophageal Doppler on the incidence of complications and length of hospital stay after major abdominal surgery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between the groups. This was a randomized controlled trial in a Swedish university hospital between November 2011 and January 2015; 150 patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery lasting 2?h or more were included. Exclusion criteria included hepatic resection or severe cardiac arrhythmia. The patients were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group received intraoperative GDFT by administering fluid boluses of 3?ml/kg tetrastarch aiming at a PVI value below 10%, while GDFT in the control group aimed for optimization of stroke volume as assessed with esophageal Doppler. Blinded observers assessed complications until postoperative day 30 using pre-defined definitions, as well as length of hospital stay. One hundred and-fifty patients were randomized and 146 patients were available for the final data analysis. Median duration of surgery was 3?h. A total of 64 complications occurred in the PVI group (N?=?74) and 70 in the Doppler group (N?=?72) (p?=?0.93). Median (IQR) length of stay was 8.0 (8.0) days in the PVI group and 8.0 (9.5) in the Doppler group (P?=?0.57). No difference in clinical outcome, as defined by number of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay, was found when goal directed fluid therapy was applied using PVI as an alternative to esophageal Doppler. PVI appears to be an acceptable alternative to esophageal Doppler for goal directed fluid therapy during major open abdominal surgery. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01458678 . Date of first registration October 20, 2011.
机译:基于腹腔手术无创性变异性指数(PVI)的目标定向输液治疗(GDFT)对临床结局的影响仅得到了很少的探讨。这项研究的目的是比较在大腹部手术后,PVI引导的术中GDFT与使用食管多普勒的对照组对并发症的发生率和住院时间的影响。我们假设两组之间没有差异。这是2011年11月至2015年1月在瑞典大学医院进行的一项随机对照试验;包括150名计划进行持续2?h或更长时间的开放式腹部手术的患者。排除标准包括肝切除或严重心律不齐。将患者按1:1的比例随机分配至干预组或对照组。干预组术中给予3?ml / kg的四淀粉液体弹丸接受术中GDFT,目标是PVI值低于10%,而对照组的GDFT则旨在通过食管多普勒评估来优化卒中量。盲人观察者使用预定义的定义评估了术后30天的并发症以及住院时间。一百零五名患者被随机分组​​,有146名患者可用于最终数据分析。中位手术时间为3?h。 PVI组共发生64例并发症(N?=?74),多普勒组共发生70例(N?=?72)(p?=?0.93)。 PVI组的中位(IQR)住院天数为8.0(8.0)天,多普勒组的中位(IQR)为8.0(9.5)天(P≥0.57)。当使用PVI替代食管多普勒进行定向输液治疗时,未发现由术后并发症数和住院时间决定的临床结果差异。对于大型开放性腹部手术,PVI似乎是食道多普勒的一种可接受的替代方法,可用于定向液体治疗。 Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01458678。首次注册日期为2011年10月20日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号