首页> 外文期刊>Bone & Joint Research >Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
【24h】

Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness

机译:外用锁定加压板替代单侧外固定架:轴向和扭转刚度的生物力学比较研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

ObjectivesExternal fixators are the traditional fixation method of choice for contaminated open fractures. However, patient acceptance is low due to the high profile and therefore physical burden of the constructs. An externalised locking compression plate is a low profile alternative. However, the biomechanical differences have not been assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the axial and torsional stiffness of the externalised titanium locking compression plate (ET-LCP), the externalised stainless steel locking compression plate (ESS-LCP) and the unilateral external fixator (UEF).MethodsA fracture gap model was created to simulate comminuted mid-shaft tibia fractures using synthetic composite bones. Fifteen constructs were stabilised with ET-LCP, ESS-LCP or UEF (five constructs each). The constructs were loaded under both axial and torsional directions to determine construct stiffness.ResultsThe mean axial stiffness was very similar for UEF (528 N/mm) and ESS-LCP (525 N/mm), while it was ...
机译:目的外固定架是受污染的开放性骨折的传统固定方法。然而,由于结构的高轮廓和因此的物理负担,患者的接受度低。外加的锁定压缩板是一种小巧的选择。但是,尚未评估生物力学差异。这项研究的目的是评估外用钛锁紧加压板(ET-LCP),外用不锈钢锁紧加压板(ESS-LCP)和单侧外固定架(UEF)的轴向和扭转刚度。建立了一个模型,以使用合成复合材料骨模拟粉碎性胫骨中段骨折。用ET-LCP,ESS-LCP或UEF稳定了15个构建体(每个5个构建体)。结果表明,UEF(528 N / mm)和ESS-LCP(525 N / mm)的平均轴向刚度非常相似,而UEF(525 N / mm)的平均轴向刚度却非常相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号