...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >New evidence on financing equity in China's health care reform - A case study on Gansu province, China
【24h】

New evidence on financing equity in China's health care reform - A case study on Gansu province, China

机译:中国医疗保健改革中筹资公平的新证据-以甘肃省为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In the transition from a planned economy to a market-oriented economy, China’s state funding for health care declined and traditional coverage plans collapsed, leaving China’s poor exposed to potentially ruinous health care costs. In reforming health care for the 21st century, equity in health care financing has become a major policy goal. To assess progress towards this goal, this paper examines the equity characteristics of health care financing in a province of northwestern China, comparing the equity performance between urban and rural areas at two different points in time. Methods Analysis of whether health care financing contributions were progressive according to income were made using the Kakwani index for each of the four health care financing channels of general taxes, public and private health insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. Two rounds of surveys were conducted, the first in 2003 (13,619 individuals in 3946 households) and the second in 2008 (12,973 individuals in 3958 households). Household socio-economic, health care payment, and utilization information were recorded in household interviews. Results Low-income households have undertaken a larger share of the health care financing burden in recent years, reflected by negative Kakwani indices, which indicate a regressive system. We found that the indices for general taxation were ?0.0024 (urban) and ?0.0281 (rural) in 2002, and ?0.0177 (urban) and ?0.0097 (rural) in 2007. Public health insurance presented different financing distributions in urban and rural areas (urban: 0.0742 in 2002, 0.0661 in 2007; rural: –0.0615 in 2002,–0.1436 in 2007.). Out-of-pocket payments were progressive but not equitable. Public health insurance coverage has expanded but financing equity has decreased. Conclusions Health care financing policies in China need ongoing reform. Given the inequity of general consumption taxes, elimination of these would improve financing equity considerably. Optimizing benefit packages in public health insurance is as important as expanding coverage, both for health care financing and for utilization management as well. Although they are progressive, out-of-pocket payments are not equitable in China and have the effect of excluding the poor from health care as they cannot afford to pay for medical care and so withdraw from treatment.
机译:背景技术在从计划经济向市场经济过渡的过程中,中国的国家医疗保健资金减少,传统的医疗保险计划崩溃,使中国的穷人面临着潜在的医疗费用损失。在面向21世纪的医疗保健改革中,医疗保健筹资的公平性已成为主要的政策目标。为了评估实现这一目标的进展,本文研究了中国西北某省医疗卫生筹资的股权特征,比较了两个不同时间点城乡之间的股权表现。方法使用卡克瓦尼(Kakwani)指数,分析一般税收,公共和私人健康保险以及自付费用的四个医疗融资渠道中的每个渠道的医疗融资捐款是否按收入递增。进行了两轮调查,第一轮于2003年(3946户家庭中的13619个人),第二轮于2008年(3958户中的12973人)。在住户访谈中记录了住户的社会经济,医疗保健支付和使用信息。结果近年来,低收入家庭承担了较大的医疗保健筹资负担,这反映在负的Kakwani指数上,这表明该系统处于回归状态。我们发现2002年的一般税收指数为0.0024(城市)和0.0281(农村),2007年为0.0177(城市)和0.0097(农村)。公共健康保险在城乡地区的融资分布不同(城市:2002年为0.0742,2007年为0.0661;农村:2002年为–0.0615,2007年为–0.1436。)。自付费用是累进的,但不公平。公共健康保险的覆盖范围有所扩大,但融资权益却有所下降。结论中国的卫生保健筹资政策需要不断改革。鉴于一般消费税的不平等,取消这些将大大改善融资公平性。在医疗保健筹资和使用管理方面,优化公共健康保险中的福利待遇与扩大覆盖范围一样重要。尽管这是渐进的,但是在中国,自付费用并不公平,并且由于穷人无力支付医疗费用并因此退出治疗,因此具有将穷人排除在医疗保健之外的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号