首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >A repeated measures, randomised cross-over trial, comparing the acute exercise response between passive and active sitting in critically ill patients
【24h】

A repeated measures, randomised cross-over trial, comparing the acute exercise response between passive and active sitting in critically ill patients

机译:一项重复措施,随机交叉试验,比较了危重患者被动坐和主动坐之间的急性运动反应

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Early mobilisation of critically ill patients is safe and beneficial, but the metabolic cost of exercise remains unquantified. This study compared the acute exercise response in critically ill participants during passive and active sitting. Method We conducted a prospective, randomised, cross-over study, in ventilated patients receiving rehabilitative physiotherapy. Ten participants completed a passive chair transfer, or a sit on the edge of the bed, followed by the alternate exercise activity on the consecutive day. The primary outcome measure was oxygen consumption. Results In comparison to resting supine, a passive chair transfer elicited no change in oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production or minute ventilation; but mean arterial pressure (91.86 mmHg (95% CI 84.61 to 99.10) to 101.23 mmHg (95% CI 93.35 to 109.11) (p = 0.002)) and heart rate (89.13 bpm (95% CI 77.14 to 101.13) to 97.21 bpm (95% CI 81.22 to 113.20) (p = 0.008)) increased. Sitting on the edge of the bed resulted in significant increases in oxygen consumption (262.33 ml/min (95% CI 201.97 to 322.70) to 353.02 ml/min (95% CI 303.50 to 402.55), p = 0.002), carbon dioxide production (171.93 ml/min (95% CI 131.87 to 211.98) to 206.23 ml/min (95% CI 151.03 to 261.43), p = 0.026), minute ventilation (9.97 l/min (95% CI 7.30 to 12.65) to 12.82 l/min (95% CI 10.29 to 15.36), p Conclusion Sitting on the edge of the bed is a more metabolically demanding activity than a passive chair transfer in critically ill patients.
机译:背景危重病人的早期动员是安全和有益的,但运动的代谢成本仍无法量化。本研究比较了危重患者被动和主动就座时的急性运动反应。方法我们对接受康复理疗的通气患者进行了一项前瞻性,随机,交叉研究。十名参与者完成了被动椅子转移或坐在床边,然后在连续的一天进行了替代运动。主要结果指标是耗氧量。结果与仰卧休息相比,被动式椅子转移不会引起耗氧量,二氧化碳生成量或分钟通气量的变化。但平均动脉压(91.86 mmHg(95%CI 84.61至99.10)至101.23 mmHg(95%CI 93.35至109.11)(p = 0.002))和心率(89.13 bpm(95%CI 77.14至101.13)至97.21 bpm( 95%CI 81.22至113.20)(p = 0.008))。坐在床的边缘会导致耗氧量显着增加(262.33 ml / min(95%CI 201.97至322.70)至353.02 ml / min(95%CI 303.50至402.55),p = 0.002),二氧化碳的产生( 171.93 ml / min(95%CI 131.87至​​211.98)至206.23 ml / min(95%CI 151.03至261.43),p = 0.026),分钟通气(9.97 l / min(95%CI 7.30至12.65)至12.82 l / min(95%CI 10.29至15.36),p结论在危重患者中,坐在床边比被动转移椅子更具代谢要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号