...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Are cultural dimensions relevant for explaining cross-national differences in antibiotic use in Europe?
【24h】

Are cultural dimensions relevant for explaining cross-national differences in antibiotic use in Europe?

机译:文化方面是否与解释欧洲抗生素使用的跨国差异相关?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Antibiotics are widely-used medicines for which a more prudent use has been advocated to minimize development of resistance. There are considerable cross-national differences that can only partially be explained by epidemiological difference and variations in health care structure. The aim of this study was to explore whether cross-national differences in use of antibiotics (prescribed and non-prescribed) are associated with differences between national cultures as described in Hofstede's model of cultural dimensions (Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance and Long-Term Orientation). Methods Country-level data of prescribed antibiotic use and self-medication with antibiotics were correlated to country-specific scores of cultural dimensions obtained from Hofstede. Data on use of antibiotics were provided by three European studies, based on different methods and/or countries: Self-medication with Antibiotics and Resistance in Europe (SAR), based on a survey in 2003 on reported use of antibiotics in 19 countries, the European Surveillance on Antimicrobial Consumption, based on distribution and reimbursement of antibiotics in ambulatory care (1997–2002), and the 2002 interview-based Eurobarometer study, asking whether respondents had taken antibiotics in the previous 12 months. These studies provided data on antibiotics use for 27 European countries in total, for which scores of cultural dimensions were also available. The SAR-study differentiated between prescribed antibiotics and self-medication with antibiotics. Results Significant positive correlations were found for Power Distance Index with use of prescribed antibiotics in the three studies (rho between 0.59 and 0.62) and with self-medication (rho = 0.54) in the SAR study. Positive significant correlations were found for the Uncertainty Avoidance Index with the use of antibiotics as reported in two studies (rho between 0.57 and 0.59; for the SAR study the correlations were insignificant). Masculinity was not significantly correlated, except in one study after controlling for GDP (r = 0.81). For Individualism and Long-Term Orientation no significant correlations were found. Conclusion Power Distance is a cultural aspect associated with antibiotic use, suggesting that the culture-specific way people deal with authority is an important factor in explaining cross-national differences in antibiotic use. There are indications that Uncertainty Avoidance also plays a role but further research is needed to better understand the complex effect of cultural dimensions.
机译:背景技术抗生素是广泛使用的药物,已经提倡更谨慎地使用该药物以最小化耐药性的发展。跨国之间存在很大差异,这只能部分由流行病学差异和医疗保健结构的变化来解释。这项研究的目的是探讨霍夫斯泰德文化维度模型(权力距离,个人主义,阳刚之气,不确定性规避和避免歧视)中跨国使用抗生素(处方药和非处方药)的差异是否与国家文化之间的差异有关。长期方向)。方法将国家一级处方抗生素使用和自我用药的数据与从霍夫斯泰德(Hofstede)获得的国家/地区特定文化程度分数相关联。三项欧洲研究基于不同的方法和/或国家/地区提供了抗生素使用的数据:欧洲自用抗生素和耐药性自用药(SAR),基于2003年对19个国家/地区报告的抗生素使用情况进行的调查,根据门诊医疗中抗生素的分配和报销情况(1997-2002年)以及基于2002年基于访谈的欧洲晴雨表研究,对欧洲抗菌药物消费进行监测,询问受访者在过去12个月中是否服用过抗生素。这些研究提供了总共27个欧洲国家使用抗生素的数据,这些数据还提供了许多文化方面的数据。 SAR研究区分了处方抗生素和自我用药。结果在三项研究中,使用处方抗生素(rho在0.59至0.62之间)与自我用药(rho = 0.54)之间的幂距离指数与自用药(rho = 0.54)之间存在显着正相关。在两项研究中发现,使用抗生素的不确定性避免指数呈显着正相关(rho在0.57至0.59之间;对于SAR研究,相关性微不足道)。与男性气质没有显着相关性,只有一项在控制了GDP之后的研究(r = 0.81)。对于个人主义和长期取向,没有发现显着的相关性。结论权力距离是与抗生素使用相关的文化方面,表明人们对待权威的文化特定方式是解释跨国使用抗生素差异的重要因素。有迹象表明,避免不确定性也起一定作用,但需要进一步研究以更好地理解文化层面的复杂影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号