...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Development and validation of a structured observation scale to measure responsiveness of physicians in rural Bangladesh
【24h】

Development and validation of a structured observation scale to measure responsiveness of physicians in rural Bangladesh

机译:制定和验证结构化的观察量表,以测量孟加拉国农村地区医生的反应能力

获取原文

摘要

Responsiveness of physicians is the social actions that physicians do to meet the legitimate expectations of service seekers. Since there is no such scale, this study aimed at developing one for measuring responsiveness of physicians in rural Bangladesh, by structured observation method. Data were collected from Khulna division of Bangladesh, through structured observation of 393 patient-consultations with physicians. The structured observation tool consisted of 64 items, with four Likert type response categories, each anchored with a defined scenario. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by same three raters observing 30 consultations. Data were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by assessment of internal consistency by ordinal alpha coefficient, inter-rater reliability by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), concurrent validity by correlating responsiveness score with waiting time, and known group validity by comparing public and private sector physicians. After removing items with more than 50% missing values, 45 items were considered for EFA. Parallel analysis suggested a 5-factor model. Nine items were removed from the list owing to?
机译:医生的反应能力是医生为满足寻求服务者的合理期望而进行的社会行为。由于没有这样的量表,因此本研究旨在开发一种通过结构化观察方法来测量孟加拉国农村地区医生的反应能力的量表。通过对393位医生的患者咨询进行结构化观察,从孟加拉国Khulna部门收集了数据。结构化观察工具由64个项目组成,具有四个Likert类型的响应类别,每个类别都有一个已定义的方案。评估者之间的可靠性由相同的三个评估者进行了30次咨询评估。通过探索性因子分析(EFA)分析数据,然后通过序数α系数评估内部一致性,通过类内相关系数(ICC)评估评定者间的可靠性,通过将响应度得分与等待时间相关联的并发有效性,以及已知的群体有效性通过比较公共和私人部门的医生。删除缺失值超过50%的项目后,考虑将45个项目用于全民教育。平行分析提出了一个五因素模型。由于?<?0.50社区,未旋转矩阵中的<0.32负载和旋转矩阵中的任何因数<0.30,因此从列表中删除了九个项目。由于34个项目(即通过EFA删除9个项目后剩余的项目数)在5个因素下被整齐地加载,解释了61.38%的共同方差,并显示出0.91的高内部一致性,因此被用作医师的响应能力规模(ROP规模)。这五个因素分别是:1)友善; 2)尊重; 3)告知和指导; 4)获得信任; 5)财务敏感性。评估者间的可靠性很高,单个评估者的ICC为0.64,平均可靠性得分为0.84。与等待时间(0.51)呈正相关,私营部门得分高0.18点表示并发和已知组有效性。 ROP量表由五个因素组成的34个项目组成。人们可以放心地将其应用在可比较的设置中,因为该量表显示出很高的内部一致性和评估者间的可靠性。需要更多的研究来在其他环境和其他类型的提供商中测试这种规模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号