首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >Estimation of central arterial pressure from the radial artery in patients undergoing invasive neuroradiological procedures
【24h】

Estimation of central arterial pressure from the radial artery in patients undergoing invasive neuroradiological procedures

机译:接受侵入性神经放射学检查的患者the动脉中心动脉压的估算

获取原文
       

摘要

Central arterial pressure can be derived from analysis of the peripheral artery waveform. The aim of this study was to compare central arterial pressures measured from an intra-aortic catheter with peripheral radial arterial pressures and with central arterial pressures estimated from the peripheral pressure wave using a pressure recording analytical method (PRAM). We studied 21 patients undergoing digital subtraction cerebral angiography under local or general anesthesia and equipped with a radial arterial catheter. A second catheter was placed in the ascending aorta for central pressure wave acquisition. Central (AO) and peripheral (RA) arterial waveforms were recorded simultaneously by PRAM for 90–180?s. During an off-line analysis, AO pressures were reconstructed (AOrec) from the RA trace using a mathematical model obtained by multi-linear regression analysis. The AOrec values obtained by PRAM were compared with the true central pressure value obtained from the catheter placed in the ascending aorta. Systolic, diastolic and mean pressures ranged from 79 to 180?mmHg, 47 to 102?mmHg, and 58 to 128?mmHg, respectively, for AO, and 83 to 174?mmHg, 47 to 107?mmHg, and 60 to 129?mmHg, respectively, for RA. The correlation coefficients between AO and RA were 0.86 (p??0.01), 0.83 (p??0.01) and 0.86 (p??0.01) for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively, and the mean differences ??0.3?mmHg, 2.4?mmHg and 1.5?mmHg. The correlation coefficients between AO and AOrec were 0.92 (p??0.001), 0.87 (p??0.001) and 0.92 (p??0.001), for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively, and the mean differences 0.01?mmHg, 1.8?mmHg and 1.2?mmHg. PRAM can provide reliable estimates of central arterial pressure.
机译:中心动脉压可通过对外周动脉波形的分析得出。这项研究的目的是比较使用压力记录分析方法(PRAM)将主动脉内导管测得的中心动脉压与周围径向动脉压以及从周围压力波估算出的中心动脉压进行比较。我们研究了21位在局部或全身麻醉下进行数字减影脑血管造影并配备a动脉导管的患者。将第二根导管放置在升主动脉中以采集中心压力波。 PRAM在90-180?s内同时记录中央(AO)和周围(RA)动脉波形。在离线分析期间,使用通过多线性回归分析获得的数学模型从RA迹线重建AO压力(AOrec)。将通过PRAM获得的AOrec值与从放置在升主动脉中的导管获得的真实中心压力值进行比较。对于AO,收缩压,舒张压和平均压力分别为79至180?mmHg,47至102?mmHg和58至128?mmHg,以及83至174?mmHg,47至107?mmHg和60至129?H。对于RA,分别为mmHg。收缩压,舒张压和平均压力的AO和RA之间的相关系数分别为0.86(p 0.01),0.83(p 0.01)和0.86(p 0.01),平均差0.3?mmHg,2.4?mmHg和1.5?mmHg。对于收缩压,舒张压和平均压力,AO和AOrec之间的相关系数分别为0.92(p <0.001),0.87(p <0.001)和0.92(p <0.001),平均差为0.01。 ?mmHg,1.8?mmHg和1.2?mmHg。 PRAM可以提供可靠的中心动脉压估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号