...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >How many general and inflammatory variables need to be fulfilled when defining sepsis due to the 2003 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS definitions in critically ill surgical patients: a retrospective observational study
【24h】

How many general and inflammatory variables need to be fulfilled when defining sepsis due to the 2003 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS definitions in critically ill surgical patients: a retrospective observational study

机译:回顾性观察性研究:根据2003 SCCM / ESICM / ACCP / ATS / SIS定义,在定义败血症时需要满足多少一般性和炎症性变量:一项回顾性观察研究

获取原文

摘要

Background It has never been specified how many of the extended general and inflammatory variables of the 2003 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS consensus sepsis definitions are mandatory to define sepsis. Objectives To find out how many of these variables are needed to identify almost all patients with septic shock. Methods Retrospective observational single-centre study in postoperative/posttraumatic patients admitted to an University adult ICU. The survey looked at 1355 admissions, from 01/2007 to 12/2008, that were monitored daily computer-assisted for the eight general and inflammatory variables temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, significant edema, positive fluid balance, hyperglycemia, white blood cell count and C-reactive protein. A total of 507 patients with infections were classified based on the first day with the highest diagnostic category of sepsis during their stay using a cut-off of 1/8 variables compared with the corresponding classification based on a cut-off of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8/8 variables. Results Applying cut-offs of 1/8 up to 8/8 variables resulted in a decreased detection rate of cases with septic shock, i.e., from 106, 105, 103, 93, 65, 21, 3 to 0. The mortality rate increased up to a cut-off of 6/8 variables, i.e., 31% (33/106), 31% (33/105), 31% (32/103), 32% (30/93), 38% (25/65), 43% (9/21), 33% (1/3) and 0% (0/0). Conclusions Frequencies and mortality rates of diagnostic categories of sepsis differ depending on the cut-off for general and inflammatory variables. A cut-off of 3/8 variables is needed to identify almost all patients with septic shock who may benefit from optimal treatment.
机译:背景技术尚未明确2003 SCCM / ESICM / ACCP / ATS / SIS败血症共识定义中有多少扩展的一般和炎症变量必须定义败血症。目的找出需要多少这些变量来识别几乎所有败血性休克患者。方法回顾性观察单中心研究纳入了大学成人ICU的术后/创伤后患者。这项调查调查了从01/2007至12/2008的1355例入院患者,这些患者每天通过计算机辅助监测,以监测温度,心率,呼吸频率,显着水肿,体液平衡,高血糖,白细胞,血液,八种常见和炎症变量计数和C反应蛋白。根据住院期间第一天诊断为败血症类别最高的507位感染患者,使用1/8变量作为分类标准,而根据2、3, 4、5、6、7或8/8变量。结果采用从1/8到8/8的临界值,导致败血性休克病例的检出率降低,即从106,105,103,93,65,21,3降低到0。死亡率增加截止至6/8变量,即31%(33/106),31%(33/105),31%(32/103),32%(30/93),38%(25 / 65),43%(9/21),33%(1/3)和0%(0/0)。结论败血症诊断类别的频率和死亡率取决于一般和炎症变量的临界值。需要确定3/8变量的临界值,以识别几乎所有可能受益于最佳治疗的脓毒性休克患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号