首页> 外文期刊>BMC Immunology >Precision and linearity targets for validation of an IFNγ ELISPOT, cytokine flow cytometry, and tetramer assay using CMV peptides
【24h】

Precision and linearity targets for validation of an IFNγ ELISPOT, cytokine flow cytometry, and tetramer assay using CMV peptides

机译:使用CMV肽验证IFNγELISPOT,细胞因子流式细胞仪和四聚体测定的精密度和线性目标

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Single-cell assays of immune function are increasingly used to monitor T cell responses in immunotherapy clinical trials. Standardization and validation of such assays are therefore important to interpretation of the clinical trial data. Here we assess the levels of intra-assay, inter-assay, and inter-operator precision, as well as linearity, of CD8+ T cell IFNγ-based ELISPOT and cytokine flow cytometry (CFC), as well as tetramer assays. Results Precision was measured in cryopreserved PBMC with a low, medium, or high response level to a CMV pp65 peptide or peptide mixture. Intra-assay precision was assessed using 6 replicates per assay; inter-assay precision was assessed by performing 8 assays on different days; and inter-operator precision was assessed using 3 different operators working on the same day. Percent CV values ranged from 4% to 133% depending upon the assay and response level. Linearity was measured by diluting PBMC from a high responder into PBMC from a non-responder, and yielded R2 values from 0.85 to 0.99 depending upon the assay and antigen. Conclusion These data provide target values for precision and linearity of single-cell assays for those wishing to validate these assays in their own laboratories. They also allow for comparison of the precision and linearity of ELISPOT, CFC, and tetramer across a range of response levels. There was a trend toward tetramer assays showing the highest precision, followed closely by CFC, and then ELISPOT; while all three assays had similar linearity. These findings are contingent upon the use of optimized protocols for each assay.
机译:背景技术在免疫疗法临床试验中,免疫功能的单细胞测定法越来越多地用于监测T细胞反应。因此,此类测定的标准化和验证对于解释临床试验数据很重要。在这里,我们评估了基于CD8 + T细胞IFNγ的ELISPOT和细胞因子流式细胞术(CFC)以及四聚体测定的测定内,测定间和操作员之间的精密度以及线性。结果在对CMV pp65肽或肽混合物具有低,中或高响应水平的低温保存的PBMC中测量了精密度。每次测定均重复6次,以评估测定内的精密度;通过在不同天进行8次测定来评估测定间准确性。并使用3名不同的操作员在同一天进行评估,以评估操作员之间的准确性。 CV值的百分比范围从4%到133%,具体取决于分析方法和反应水平。线性是通过将高反应者的PBMC稀释为无反应者的PBMC来测定的,根据测定和抗原的不同,得出的R 2 值为0.85至0.99。结论这些数据为那些希望在自己的实验室中验证这些测定的人提供了单细胞测定的精确度和线性的目标值。它们还允许比较整个响应水平范围内的ELISPOT,CFC和四聚体的精度和线性。四聚体检测趋势显示出最高的精确度,紧随其后的是CFC,然后是ELISPOT。而所有三个测定均具有相似的线性。这些发现取决于每种试验使用的优化方案。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号