首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial

机译:便利的患者体验反馈可以改善护理质量:一项III期整群随机对照试验的先导研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background England’s extensive NHS patient survey programme has not fulfilled government promises of widespread improvements in patients’ experiences, and media reports of poor nursing care in NHS hospitals are increasingly common. Impediments to the surveys’ impact on the quality of nursing care may include: the fact that they are not ward-specific, so nurses claim “that doesn’t happen on my ward”; nurses’ scepticism about the relevance of patient feedback to their practice; and lack of prompt communication of results. The surveys’ impact could be increased by: conducting ward-specific surveys; returning results to ward staff more quickly; including patients’ written comments in reports; and offering nurses an opportunity to discuss the feedback. Very few randomised trials have been conducted to test the effectiveness of patient feedback on quality improvement and there have been few, if any, published trials of ward-specific patient surveys. Methods Over two years, postal surveys of recent inpatients were conducted at four-monthly intervals in 18 wards in two NHS Trusts in England. Wards were randomly allocated to Basic Feedback (ward-specific printed patient survey results including patients’ written comments sent to nurses by letter); Feedback Plus (in addition to printed results, ward meetings to discuss results and plan improvements) or Control (no active feedback of survey results). Patient survey responses to questions about nursing care were used to compute wards’ average Nursing Care Scores at each interval. Nurses’ reactions to the patient feedback were recorded. Results Conducting ward-level surveys and delivering ward-specific results was feasible. Ward meetings were effective for engaging nurses and challenging scepticism and patients’ written comments stimulated interest. 4,236 (47%) patients returned questionnaires. Nursing Care Scores improved more for Feedback Plus than Basic Feedback or Control (difference between Control and Feedback Plus?=?8.28?±?7.2 (p?=?0.02)). Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence that facilitated patient feedback can improve patients’ experiences such that a full trial is justified. These findings suggest that merely informing nurses of patient survey results in writing does not stimulate improvements, even if results are disaggregated by ward, but the addition of ward meetings had an important and significant impact.
机译:背景资料英格兰广泛的NHS病人调查计划并未兑现政府关于大幅改善病人体验的承诺,而且媒体报道NHS医院护理质量差。妨碍调查对护理质量的影响的障碍可能包括:事实并非针对病房,因此护士声称“我病房没有发生”;护士对患者反馈与其行为的相关性表示怀疑;并且缺乏及时的结果沟通。可以通过以下方式增加调查的影响:进行针对病房的调查;将结果更快地返回给病房工作人员;在报告中包括患者的书面评论;并为护士提供了讨论反馈的机会。很少进行随机试验来检验患者对质量改善的反馈意见的有效性,而针对病区特定患者调查的已发表试验(如果有的话)也很少。方法两年来,在英格兰的两个NHS信托基金中,在18个病房中,每四个月进行一次对最近住院患者的邮政调查。病房被随机分配给基本反馈(针对病房的打印患者调查结果,包括通过信件发送给护士的患者书面评论);反馈增强版(除了打印结果,还包括讨论结果和计划改进的病房会议)或控制(对调查结果无积极反馈)。通过对患者有关护理问题的调查问卷,可以计算出每个间隔期间病房的平均护理得分。记录护士对患者反馈的反应。结果进行病房级调查并提供病房特定结果是可行的。病房会议有效地吸引了护士,并挑战了怀疑态度,患者的书面评论激发了人们的兴趣。 4,236(47%)患者返回了问卷。反馈加分的护理分数比基本反馈或对照得到的改善更大(对照与反馈加分之间的差异为?8.28?±?7.2(p?=?0.02))。结论这项研究提供了初步的证据,即便利的患者反馈可以改善患者的体验,因此有必要进行全面的试验。这些发现表明,即使将结果以病房分类,仅以书面形式告知护士患者调查结果也不会促进病情改善,但是增加病房会议会产生重要而重大的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号