首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Nationwide survey to evaluate the decision-making process in euthanasia requests in Belgium: do specifically trained 2nd physicians improve quality of consultation?
【24h】

Nationwide survey to evaluate the decision-making process in euthanasia requests in Belgium: do specifically trained 2nd physicians improve quality of consultation?

机译:全国范围内的调查,以评估比利时安乐死请求中的决策过程:经过专门培训的第二医师会提高咨询质量吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Following the 2002 enactment of the Belgian law on euthanasia, which requires the consultation of an independent second physician before proceeding with euthanasia, the Life End Information Forum (LEIF) was founded which provides specifically trained physicians who can act as mandatory consultants in euthanasia requests. This study assesses quality of consultations in Flanders and Brussels and compares these between LEIF and non-LEIF consultants. Methods A questionnaire was sent in 2009 to a random sample of 3,006 physicians in Belgium from specialties likely involved in the care of dying patients. Several questions about the last euthanasia request of one of their patients were asked. As LEIF serves the Flemish speaking community (i.e. region of Flanders and the bilingual Brussels Capital Region) and no similar counterpart is present in Wallonia, analyses were limited to Flemish speaking physicians in Flanders and Brussels. Results Response was 34%. Of the 244 physicians who indicated having received a euthanasia request seventy percent consulted a second physician in their last request; in 30% this was with a LEIF physician. Compared to non-LEIF physicians, LEIF physicians were more often not a colleague (69% vs 42%) and not a co-attending physician (89% vs 66%). They tended to more often discuss the request with the attending physician (100% vs 95%) and with the family (76% vs 69%), and also more frequently helped the attending physician with performing euthanasia (44% vs 24%). No significant differences were found in the extent to which they talked to the patient (96% vs 93%) and examined the patient file (94% vs 97%). Conclusion In cases of explicit euthanasia requests in Belgium, the consultation procedure of another physician by the attending physician is not optimal and can be improved. Training and putting at disposal consultants through forums such as LEIF seems able to improve this situation. Adding stipulations in the law about the necessary competencies and tasks of consulting physicians may additionally incite improvement. Irrespective of whether euthanasia is a legal practice within a country, similar services may prove useful to also improve quality of consultations in various other difficult end-of-life decision-making situations.
机译:背景信息比利时于2002年颁布了安乐死法律,该法律要求在进行安乐死之前必须征询独立的第二位医生的意见,成立了生命终结信息论坛(LEIF),该论坛提供经过专门培训的医生,他们可以在安乐死要求中担任强制性顾问。这项研究评估了法兰德斯和布鲁塞尔的咨询质量,并比较了LEIF和非LEIF顾问之间的咨询质量。方法2009年向比利时3,006名医生随机抽取了一份问卷,调查对象可能来自垂死患者护理领域。他们询问了其中一名患者的最后一次安乐死要求。由于LEIF为佛兰德语社区(即佛兰德地区和双语布鲁塞尔首都地区)提供服务,而瓦隆地区没有类似的对口机构,因此分析仅限于佛兰德语和布鲁塞尔的佛兰德语医师。结果回应率为34%。表示已收到安乐死要求的244位医生中,有70%的医生在上次要求中咨询了第二位医生。在30%的情况下,这是由LEIF医师提供的。与非LEIF医师相比,LEIF医师通常不是同事(69%vs 42%),也不是共同主治医师(89%vs 66%)。他们倾向于与主治医师(100%对95%)和家人(76%对69%)讨论该要求,并且更经常地帮助主治医师实施安乐死(44%对24%)。他们与患者交谈的程度(96%对93%)和检查患者档案(94%对97%)没有发现显着差异。结论在比利时明确要求安乐死的情况下,主治医师对另一位医师的咨询程序不是最佳的,可以改进。通过诸如LEIF之类的论坛培训和安排顾问可以改善这种情况。在法律中增加有关必要能力和咨询医师任务的规定可能会进一步促进改善。无论安乐死是否在一个国家内是一种法律惯例,在其他各种困难的生命终结决策情况下,类似的服务也可能有助于提高咨询质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号