首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Barriers and opportunities for evidence-based health service planning: the example of developing a Decision Analytic Model to plan services for sexually transmitted infections in the UK
【24h】

Barriers and opportunities for evidence-based health service planning: the example of developing a Decision Analytic Model to plan services for sexually transmitted infections in the UK

机译:基于证据的卫生服务计划的障碍和机遇:以制定决策分析模型来规划英国性传播感染服务为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Decision Analytic Models (DAMs) are established means of evidence-synthesis to differentiate between health interventions. They have mainly been used to inform clinical decisions and health technology assessment at the national level, yet could also inform local health service planning. For this, a DAM must take into account the needs of the local population, but also the needs of those planning its services. Drawing on our experiences from stakeholder consultations, where we presented the potential utility of a DAM for planning local health services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the UK, and the evidence it could use to inform decisions regarding different combinations of service provision, in terms of their costs, cost-effectiveness, and public health outcomes, we discuss the barriers perceived by stakeholders to the use of DAMs to inform service planning for local populations, including (1) a tension between individual and population perspectives; (2) reductionism; and (3) a lack of transparency regarding models, their assumptions, and the motivations of those generating models. Discussion Technological advances, including improvements in computing capability, are facilitating the development and use of models such as DAMs for health service planning. However, given the current scepticism among many stakeholders, encouraging informed critique and promoting trust in models to aid health service planning is vital, for example by making available and explicit the methods and assumptions underlying each model, associated limitations, and the process of validation. This can be achieved by consultation and training with the intended users, and by allowing access to the workings of the models, and their underlying assumptions (e.g. via the internet), to show how they actually work. Summary Constructive discussion and education will help build a consensus on the purposes of STI services, the need for service planning to be evidence-based, and the potential for mathematical tools like DAMs to facilitate this.
机译:背景决策分析模型(DAM)是建立证据综合以区分健康干预措施的手段。它们主要用于在国家一级为临床决策和卫生技术评估提供信息,但也可以为地方卫生服务计划提供信息。为此,DAM必须考虑当地居民的需求,还要考虑那些计划其服务的人的需求。借鉴利益相关者协商的经验,在此我们介绍了DAM在英国为性传播感染(STI)规划本地医疗服务的潜在效用,以及可用于为有关服务组合不同组合的决策提供依据的证据。在成本,成本效益和公共卫生成果方面,我们讨论了利益相关者在使用DAM来为当地人口提供服务计划方面遇到的障碍,包括(1)个人和人口观点之间的张力; (2)还原主义; (3)在模型,其假设以及产生模型的动机方面缺乏透明度。讨论技术进步,包括计算能力的提高,正在促进DAM等模型的开发和使用,以进行卫生服务规划。但是,考虑到当前许多利益相关者的怀疑,鼓励知情的批评和增进对模型的信任以帮助进行卫生服务计划至关重要,例如,通过公开和明确每个模型所基于的方法和假设,相关的局限性以及验证过程。这可以通过与目标用户进行协商和培训,并允许访问模型的工作及其潜在假设(例如通过互联网)来显示其实际工作方式来实现。总结建设性的讨论和教育将帮助您在STI服务的目的,服务计划以证据为基础的需求以及DAM之类的数学工具促进此方面达成共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号