首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >Bacterial isolation and antibiotic susceptibility from diabetic foot ulcers in Kenya using microbiological tests and comparison with RT-PCR in detection of S. aureus and MRSA
【24h】

Bacterial isolation and antibiotic susceptibility from diabetic foot ulcers in Kenya using microbiological tests and comparison with RT-PCR in detection of S. aureus and MRSA

机译:使用微生物学检测方法和肯尼亚RT-PCR方法比较肯尼亚糖尿病足溃疡的细菌分离和药敏性,以检测金黄色葡萄球菌和MRSA

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract ObjectivesDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) often lead to hospital admissions, amputations and deaths; however, there is no up-to-date information on microbial isolates from DFUs and no mention of utilization of molecular techniques in Sub-Saharan Africa. We conducted a cross-sectional study among 83 adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Kenya over 12?months. The study aimed to isolate, identify bacteria, their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in active DFUs, and to compare standard microbiological methods versus a real-time PCR commercial kit in the detection of Staphylococcus aureus DNA and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) DNA.ResultsEighty swabs (94%) were culture-positive; 29% were Gram-positive and 65% were Gram-negative. The main organisms isolated were S. aureus (16%), Escherichia coli (15%), Proteus mirabilis (11%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7%). The bacterial isolates showed resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefepime, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, clindamycin, erythromycin, piperacillin–tazobactam, tetracycline and trimethoprim–sulphamethoxazole (TMPSMX). Thirty-one percent of the S. aureus isolated and 40% of the Gram-negatives were multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). There was a high prevalence of nosocomial bacteria. MRSA were not identified using culture methods but were identified using PCR. PCR was more sensitive but less specific than culture-based methods to identify S. aureus.
机译:摘要目的糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)经常导致住院,截肢和死亡。然而,目前尚无来自DFU的微生物分离物的最新信息,也没有提及在撒哈拉以南非洲使用分子技术的情况。我们在肯尼亚的一家三级医院对83名成年患者进行了为期12个月的横断面研究。该研究旨在分离,鉴定活性DFU中的细菌及其抗生素敏感性模式,并比较标准微生物学方法和实时PCR商业试剂盒检测金黄色葡萄球菌DNA和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)DNA的能力。结果八支拭子(94%)培养阳性。革兰氏阳性占29%,革兰氏阴性占65%。分离出的主要生物是金黄色葡萄球菌(16%),大肠杆菌(15%),奇异变形杆菌(11%),肺炎克雷伯菌(7%)和铜绿假单胞菌(7%)。细菌分离株显示出对常用抗生素的抗性,例如氨苄青霉素,阿莫西林,头孢吡肟,头孢他啶,头孢呋辛,克林霉素,红霉素,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦,四环素和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMPSMX)。有31%的金黄色葡萄球菌和40%的革兰氏阴性菌是耐多药生物。医院内细菌高发。没有使用培养方法鉴定出MRSA,但是使用PCR鉴定了MRSA。 PCR比基于培养的方法更能识别金黄色葡萄球菌,但特异性较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号