首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Using pathology-specific laboratory profiles in Clinical Pathology to reduce inappropriate test requesting: two completed audit cycles
【24h】

Using pathology-specific laboratory profiles in Clinical Pathology to reduce inappropriate test requesting: two completed audit cycles

机译:在临床病理学中使用病理学特定的实验室资料以减少不适当的测试请求:两个完整的审核周期

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Systematic reviews have shown that, although well prepared, the Consensus Guidelines have failed to change clinical practice. In the healthcare district of Castelnovo né Monti (Reggio Emilia, Italy), it became necessary for the GPs and Clinical Pathologists to work together to jointly define laboratory profiles. Methods Observational study with two cycles of retrospective audit on test request forms, in a primary care setting. Objectives of the study were to develop pathology-specific laboratory profiles and to increase the number of provisional diagnoses on laboratory test request forms. A Multiprofessional Multidisciplinary Inter-hospital Work Team developed pathology-specific laboratory profiles for more effective test requesting. After 8 training sessions that used a combined strategy with multifaceted interventions, the 23 General Practitioners (GPs) in the trial district (Castelnovo nè Monti) tested the profiles; the 21 GPs in the Puianello district were the control group; all GPs in both districts participated in the trial. All laboratory tests for both healthcare districts are performed at the Laboratory located in the trial district. A baseline and a 1-year audit were performed in both districts on the GPs’ request forms. Results Seven pathology-specific laboratory profiles for outpatients were developed. In the year after the first audit cycle: 1) the number of tests requested in the trial district was distinctly lower than that in the previous year, with a decrease of about 5% (p? Conclusions The first audit cycle showed a significant decrease in the number of tests ordered only in the trial district. The combined strategy used in this study improved the prescriptive compliance of most of the GPs involved. The presence of the clinical pathologist is seen as an added value.
机译:背景技术系统评价显示,尽管准备充分,但共识指南未能改变临床实践。在CastelnovonéMonti(意大利雷焦艾米利亚,意大利)的医疗保健区,全科医生和临床病理学家有必要共同努力,共同确定实验室概况。方法在基层医疗机构中,对试验要求表进行两轮回顾性审核的观察性研究。该研究的目的是建立针对病理的实验室概况,并增加实验室检验申请表上的临时诊断数量。一个多专业,多学科的医院间工作团队开发了针对特定病理的实验室资料,以更有效地进行测试。经过8次培训后,将策略与多方面的干预措施结合使用,试验区(CastelnovonèMonti)的23名全科医师(GP)测试了个人资料;对照组为普安内洛地区的21名全科医生。两个地区的所有GP均参加了试验。两个医疗区的所有实验室测试均在试验区的实验室进行。在GP的申请表中,两个地区均进行了基准和为期1年的审核。结果建立了七种针对门诊患者的病理学特定实验室资料。在第一个审核周期后的一年中:1)试验区所要求的测试数量明显少于上一年,减少了5%(p?结论)仅在试验区内订购的测试数量。本研究中使用的联合策略改善了大多数相关GP的处方依从性,临床病理学家的存在被认为是附加值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号