首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Comparing Dutch Case management care models for people with dementia and their caregivers: The design of the COMPAS study
【24h】

Comparing Dutch Case management care models for people with dementia and their caregivers: The design of the COMPAS study

机译:比较荷兰痴呆症患者及其照顾者的案例管理护理模式:COMPAS研究的设计

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Dementia care in the Netherlands is shifting from fragmented, ad hoc care to more coordinated and personalised care. Case management contributes to this shift. The linkage model and a combination of intensive case management and joint agency care models were selected based on their emerging prominence in the Netherlands. It is unclear if these different forms of case management are more effective than usual care in improving or preserving the functioning and well-being at the patient and caregiver level and at the societal cost. The objective of this article is to describe the design of a study comparing these two case management care models against usual care. Clinical and cost outcomes are investigated while care processes and the facilitators and barriers for implementation of these models are considered. Design Mixed methods include a prospective, observational, controlled, cohort study among persons with dementia and their primary informal caregiver in regions of the Netherlands with and without case management including a qualitative process evaluation. Inclusion criteria for the cohort study are: community-dwelling individuals with a dementia diagnosis who are not terminally-ill or anticipate admission to a nursing home within 6?months and with an informal caregiver who speaks fluent Dutch. Person with dementia-informal caregiver dyads are followed for two years. The primary outcome measure is the Neuropsychiatric Inventory for the people with dementia and the General Health Questionnaire for their caregivers. Secondary outcomes include: quality of life and needs assessment in both persons with dementia and caregivers, activity of daily living, competence of care, and number of crises. Costs are measured from a societal perspective using cost diaries. Process indicators measure the quality of care from the participant’s perspective. The qualitative study uses purposive sampling methods to ensure a wide variation of respondents. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders based on the theoretical model of adaptive implementation are planned. Discussion This study provides relevant insights into care processes, description of two case management models along with clinical and economic data from persons with dementia and caregivers to clarify important differences in two case management care models compared to usual care.
机译:背景技术荷兰的痴呆症护理正在从分散的临时护理转向更加协调和个性化的护理。案例管理有助于这一转变。根据其在荷兰日益突出的影响力,选择了联系模式,并结合了病案管理和联合机构护理模式。尚不清楚这些不同形式的病例管理是否比常规护理更有效地改善或保持患者和照料者一级的功能和福祉,并以社会成本为代价。本文的目的是描述将这两种病例管理护理模型与常规护理进行比较的研究设计。研究临床和成本结果,同时考虑护理过程以及实施这些模型的促进因素和障碍。设计混合方法包括对荷兰地区痴呆症患者及其主要的非正式照料者进行的前瞻性,观察性,对照,队列研究,有无病例管理,包括定性过程评估。这项队列研究的纳入标准是:患有痴呆症诊断的社区居民,他们不是绝症,或者预计在6个月内可以进入疗养院,并且其非正式的护理人员会说流利的荷兰语。患有痴呆症-非正式护理者的人被随访了两年。主要结局指标是痴呆症患者的神经精神病学调查表以及照护者的《一般健康状况调查表》。次要结果包括:痴呆症和看护者的生活质量和需求评估,日常生活活动,护理能力以及危机次数。成本是使用成本日记从社会角度衡量的。流程指标从参与者的角度衡量护理质量。定性研究使用目的抽样方法来确保受访者的差异很大。计划基于自适应实施的理论模型与利益相关者进行半结构化访谈。讨论本研究提供有关护理过程的相关见解,两种病例管理模型的描述以及来自痴呆症患者和护理人员的临床和经济数据,以阐明与常规护理相比两种病例管理护理模型的重要差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号