首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey
【24h】

Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey

机译:斯里兰卡科伦坡大学妇产科的Foley导管用于引产引产子宫颈:临床审计与患者满意度调查

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundIntracervical insertion of a Foley catheter (FC) has shown to be a safe, effective and relatively feasible mechanical method of cervical priming in induction of labour (IOL). We evaluated indications, effectiveness, patient acceptability and outcomes of FC use in IOL adhering to the ward protocol in our unit. MethodsA clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey conducted between July and September 2013 in University Obstetric Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Patients selected for IOL for obstetric reasons were primed with Foley as per ward protocol. All had singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation, intact membranes and period of gestation of 37?weeks or above. Women with a history of more than one caesarean section or uterine surgery, low-lying placenta and fetal growth restriction were excluded. Subjects who had a Modified Bishop Score (MBS) of less than 3, a 16Fr FC was inserted into cervical canal. Catheter was left undisturbed until spontaneous expulsion or no longer than 48?h. In women with MBS of less than 6 at 48?h after FC insertion, 3?mg prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablet was used subsequently. Artificial membrane rupture with or without oxytocin was used if MBS of 6 or more and in women not in labour 24?h after prostaglandins. Patient satisfaction for Foley insertion was assessed with regards to the degree of comfort using a validated visual analogue scale (0–10). ResultsThere were a total of 910 deliveries during the study period. Fifty-six women were primed with FC. Thirty-two (57%) were nulliparous. During induction of labour, 53(95%) reported mild or no discomfort. MBS of 6 or more was achieved in 36/56 (64%) Foley insertions. Twenty needed further intervention with prostaglandins. FC only group had 5 caesarean sections and 31 vaginal deliveries and Foley/prostaglandin group had 7 caesarean sections and 13 vaginal deliveries. Of the 24 women who were induced due to completion of 41?weeks of gestation with otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies, 17 had MBS >6 post priming with Foley and 20 (83%) delivered vaginally. Subjects who had Foley only had a lesser chance of having a caesarean delivery compared to subjects who had Foley followed by prostaglandin (relative risk?=?0.40, 95% CI?=?0.15–1.09, P?=?0.09). DiscussionFC is a good choice for pre-induction cervical priming with high patient comfort. FC becomes more important in IOL cost reduction in our setting. FC alone seems to be an effective for IOL in women who have completed 41?weeks of gestation with otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies.
机译:背景技术腔内插入Foley导管(FC)已被证明是一种安全,有效且相对可行的宫颈引产引产术(IOL)的机械方法。我们根据本病房的病房规程评估了IOL中的适应症,有效性,患者可接受性和FC使用的结局。方法:于2013年7月至9月在斯里兰卡科伦坡大学产科进行临床审计并进行患者满意度调查。根据病房规程,因产科原因而被选为IOL的患者均需接受Foley灌注。所有患者均单胎妊娠,头位表现,胎膜完整,妊娠期37周或以上。剖宫产或子宫手术超过一次,低位胎盘和胎儿生长受限的女性被排除在外。修正Bishop评分(MBS)小于3的受试者将16Fr FC插入宫颈管。导管保持不受干扰,直到自发排出或不超过48?h。对于在FC插入48h后MBS小于6的女性,随后使用3mg前列腺素E2阴道片。如果MBS为6或更高,并且在前列腺素后24小时未工作的妇女中使用人工膜破裂或不使用催产素。使用经过验证的视觉模拟量表(0-10)评估患者对Foley插入的满意度,以评估其舒适度。结果在研究期间共进行了910次分娩。 56名妇女接受了FC灌注。三十二(57%)是未产的。在引产期间,有53名(95%)报告有轻度不适或无不适。在36/56(64%)Foley插入物中获得了6或更高的MBS。二十个需要用前列腺素进一步干预。仅FC组剖腹产5例,阴道分娩31例; Foley /前列腺素组剖腹产7例,阴道分娩13例。在因妊娠41周而完成妊娠并没有其他复杂妊娠的24名妇女中,有17名在用Foley引发后MBS> 6且有20名(83%)阴道分娩。与先后接受前列腺素和Foley的受试者相比,接受Foley的受试者进行剖腹产的机会较小(相对危险度= 0.40,95%CI = 0.15-1.09,P = 0.09)。 DiscussionFC是用于预感应宫颈灌注且患者舒适度高的理想选择。在我们的环境中,FC在降低IOL成本方面变得越来越重要。单独的FC似乎对完成41周妊娠且没有其他复杂妊娠的妇女的IOL有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号