首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >The impact of different benefit packages of Medical Financial Assistance Scheme on health service utilization of poor population in Rural China
【24h】

The impact of different benefit packages of Medical Financial Assistance Scheme on health service utilization of poor population in Rural China

机译:医疗财政救助方案的不同待遇对中国农村贫困人口卫生服务利用的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Since 2003 and 2005, National Pilot Medical Financial Assistance Scheme (MFA) has been implemented in rural and urban areas of China to improve the poorest families' accessibility to health services. Local governments of the pilot areas formulated various benefit packages. Comparative evaluation research on the effect of different benefit packages is urgently needed to provide evidence for improving policy-making of MFA. This study was based on a MFA pilot project, which was one component of Health VIII Project conducted in rural China. This article aimed to compare difference in health services utilization of poor families between two benefit package project areas: H8 towns (package covering inpatient service, some designated preventive and curative health services but without out-patient service reimbursement in Health VIII Project,) and H8SP towns (package extending coverage of target population, covering out- patient services and reducing co-payment rate in Health VIII Supportive Project), and to find out major influencing factors on their services utilization. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2004, which used stratified cluster sampling method to select poor families who have been enrolled in MFA scheme in rural areas of ChongQing. All family members of the enrolled households were interviewed. 748 and 1129 respondents from two kinds of project towns participated in the survey. Among them, 625 and 869 respondents were included (age≥15) in the analysis of this study. Two-level linear multilevel model and binomial regressions with a log link were used to assess influencing factors on different response variables measuring service utilization. Results In general, there was no statistical significance in physician visits and hospitalizations among all the respondents between the two kinds of benefit package towns. After adjusting for major confounding factors, poor families in H8SP towns had much higher frequency of MFA use (β = 1.17) and less use of hospitalization service (OR = 0.7 (H8SP/H8), 95%CI (0.5, 1.0)) among all the respondents. While calculating use of hospital services among those who needed, there was significant difference (p = 0.032) in percentage of hospitalization use between H8SP towns (46%) and H8 towns (33%). Meanwhile, the non-use but ought-to-use hospitalization ratio of H8SP (54%) was lower than that of H8 (67 %) towns. This indicated that hospitalization utilizations had improved in H8SP towns among those who needed. Awareness of MFA detailed benefit package and presence of physician diagnosed chronic disease had significant association with frequency of MFA use and hospitalizations. There was no significant difference in rate of borrowing money for illness treatment between the two project areas. Large amount of medical debt had strong association with hospitalization utilization. Conclusions The new extended benefit package implemented in pilot towns significantly increased the poor families' accessibility to MFA package in H8SP than that of H8 towns, which reduced poor families' demand of hospitalization services for their chronic diseases, and improved the poor population's utilization of out-patient services to some degree. It can encourage poor people to use more outpatient services thus reduce their hospitalization need. Presence of chronic disease and hospitalization had strong association with the presence of large amount of medical debt, which indicated that: although establishment of MFA had facilitated accessibility of poor families to this new system, and improved service utilization of poor families to some degree, but its role in reducing poor families' medical debt resulted from chronic disease and hospitalization was still very limited. Besides, the following requirements of MFA: co-payment for in-patient services, ceiling and deductibles for reimbursement, limitations on eligibility for diseases reimbursement, also served as most important obstacles for poor families' access to health care. Therefore, there is great need to improve MFA benefit package design in the future, including extending to cover out-patient services, raising ceiling for reimbursement, removing deductibles of MFA, reducing co-payment rate, and integrating MFA with New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme more closely so as to provide more protection to the poor families.
机译:背景技术自2003年和2005年以来,中国农村和城市地区实施了国家医疗财政资助试点计划(MFA),以改善最贫困家庭获得医疗服务的机会。试验区地方政府制定了各种优惠政策。迫切需要对不同福利待遇的效果进行比较评估研究,以为改善MFA的政策制定提供依据。这项研究基于MFA试点项目,该项目是在中国农村开展的Health VIII项目的组成部分。本文旨在比较两个福利计划项目区域之间贫困家庭的卫生服务利用差异:H8镇(涵盖住院服务,一些指定的预防和治疗性卫生服务,但在Health VIII项目中不提供门诊服务报销的计划)和H8SP城镇(一揽子计划,扩大了目标人群的覆盖范围,涵盖了门诊服务,并降低了健康VIII支持项目的共付率),并找出了影响其服务利用的主要因素。方法于2004年进行横断面调查,采用分层整群抽样方法,选择重庆农村地区参加MFA计划的贫困家庭。对所有入户家庭成员进行了采访。来自两个项目镇的748位和1129位受访者参加了调查。在本研究的分析中,包括625名和869名(≥15岁)受访者。使用两级线性多级模型和带有对数链接的二项式回归来评估影响服务利用率的不同响应变量的影响因素。结果总体而言,两种福利套餐镇之间的所有受访者的医师就诊和住院情况均无统计学意义。在对主要混杂因素进行调整后,H8SP城镇中的贫困家庭使用MFA的频率更高(β= 1.17),而住院服务的使用率更低(OR = 0.7(H8SP / H8),95%CI(0.5,1.0))所有的受访者。在计算需要服务的人的医院服务使用率时,H8SP镇(46%)和H8镇(33%)之间的住院使用百分比存在显着差异(p = 0.032)。同时,H8SP的未使用但应该使用的住院率(54%)低于H8城镇(67%)。这表明在需要的人群中,H8SP城镇的住院利用率有所提高。对MFA详细福利包的了解以及医生诊断为慢性病的存在与MFA使用频率和住院次数显着相关。在两个项目区域之间,用于疾病治疗的借贷利率没有显着差异。大量的医疗债务与住院利用密切相关。结论在试点镇实施的新的扩展福利计划显着增加了H8SP中贫困家庭获得MFA计划的机会,这比H8城镇减少了贫困家庭对其慢性病住院服务的需求,并改善了贫困人口的外来利用病人服务在一定程度上。它可以鼓励穷人使用更多的门诊服务,从而减少他们的住院需求。慢性病的存在和住院与大量医疗债务的存在密切相关,这表明:尽管建立MFA有助于贫困家庭使用该新系统,并在一定程度上改善了贫困家庭的服务利用,但是它在减少因慢性病和住院而造成的贫困家庭医疗债务方面的作用仍然非常有限。此外,MFA的以下要求:住院服务的共付额,报销的最高限额和自付额,疾病报销资格的限制,这也是贫困家庭获得医疗服务的最主要障碍。因此,未来迫切需要改进MFA福利计划的设计,包括扩展到覆盖门诊服务,提高报销上限,取消MFA的免赔额,降低共同支付率,以及将MFA与新农村合作医疗计划整合更紧密地为贫困家庭提供更多保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号