首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Implementing administrative evidence based practices: lessons from the field in six local health departments across the United States
【24h】

Implementing administrative evidence based practices: lessons from the field in six local health departments across the United States

机译:实施基于行政证据的做法:美国六个地方卫生部门的实地经验教训

获取原文
           

摘要

Administrative evidence based practices (A-EBPs) are agency level structures and activities positively associated with performance measures (e.g., achieving core public health functions, carrying out evidence-based interventions). The objectives of this study were to examine the contextual conditions and explore differences in local health department (LHD) characteristics that influence the implementation of A-EBPs. Qualitative case studies were conducted based on data from 35 practitioners in six LHDs across the United States. The sample was chosen using an A-EBP score from our 2012 national survey and was linked to secondary data from the National Public Health Performance Standards Program. Three LHDs that scored high and three LHDs that scored low on both measures were selected as case study sites. The 37-question interview guide explored LHD use of an evidence based decision making process, including A-EBPs and evidence-based programs and policies. Each interview took 30–60 min. Standard qualitative methodology was used for data coding and analysis using NVivo software. As might be expected, high-capacity LHDs were more likely to have strong leadership, partnerships, financial flexibility, workforce development activities, and an organizational culture supportive of evidence based decision making and implementation of A-EBPs. They were also more likely to describe having strong or important relationships with universities and other educational resources, increasing their access to resources and allowing them to more easily share knowledge and expertise. Differences between high- and low-capacity LHDs in A-EBP domains highlight the importance of investments in these areas and the potential those investments have to contribute to overall efficiency and performance. Further research may identify avenues to enhance resources in these domains to create an organizational culture supportive of A-EBPs.
机译:基于行政证据的做法(A-EBP)是与绩效指标(例如,实现核心公共卫生职能,执行基于证据的干预措施)正相关的机构级结构和活动。这项研究的目的是检查环境条件,并探讨影响A-EBPs实施的地方卫生部门(LHD)特征的差异。定性案例研究是基于来自全美6个LHD的35名从业者的数据进行的。该样本是使用我们2012年全国调查的A-EBP得分选择的,并与国家公共卫生绩效标准计划的次要数据相关联。在这两种方法中,三个得分较高的LHD和三个得分较低的LHD被选为案例研究地点。这本包含37个问题的访谈指南探讨了LHD在基于证据的决策过程中的使用,包括A-EBP和基于证据的计划和政策。每次采访花费30–60分钟。使用NVivo软件,使用标准的定性方法进行数据编码和分析。可以预见,大容量的左驾驶右舷更有可能具有强大的领导力,伙伴关系,财务灵活性,劳动力发展活动以及支持基于证据的决策和实施A-EBP的组织文化。他们还更有可能描述与大学和其他教育资源有牢固或重要的关系,增加了他们获得资源的机会,并使他们更容易分享知识和专业知识。 A-EBP域中的高容量和低容量LHD之间的差异凸显了在这些领域进行投资的重要性以及这些投资对提高整体效率和绩效的潜力。进一步的研究可能会确定在这些领域中增加资源以创建支持A-EBP的组织文化的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号