首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >The effect of sedation and/or analgesia as rescue treatment during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the patients with Interface intolerance after Extubation
【24h】

The effect of sedation and/or analgesia as rescue treatment during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the patients with Interface intolerance after Extubation

机译:拔管后界面不耐受患者无创正压通气中镇静和/或镇痛作为抢救治疗的效果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Sedation and/or analgesia can relieve the patient-ventilator asynchrony. However, whether sedation and/or analgesia can benefit the clinical outcome of the patients with interface intolerance is still unclear. Methods A retrospective study was performed on patients with interface intolerance who received noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) after extubation in seven intensive care units (ICU) of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The primary outcome was rate of NIPPV failure (defined as need for reintubation and mechanical ventilation); Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality rate and length of ICU stay after extubation. Results A total of 80 patients with oral-nasal mask (90%) and facial mask (10%) were included in the analysis. 41 out of 80 patients received sedation and/or analgesia treatment (17 used analgesia, 11 used sedation and 13 used both) at some time during NIPPV. They showed a decrease of NIPPV failure rate, (15% vs. 38%, P =?0.015; adjusted odd ratio [OR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10–0.86, P =?0.025), mortality rate (7% vs. 33%, P =?0.004; adjusted OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03–0.60, P =?0.008), and the length of ICU stay after extubation. Conclusion This clinical study suggests that sedation and/or analgesia treatment can decrease the rate of NIPPV failure, hospital mortality rate and ICU LOS in patients with interface intolerance after extubution during NIPPV.
机译:背景镇静和/或镇痛可以缓解患者-呼吸机的异步性。然而,镇静和/或镇痛是否可以使界面不耐受患者的临床结局受益尚不清楚。方法对四川大学华西医院七个重症监护室(ICU)拔管后接受无创正压通气(NIPPV)的界面不耐受患者进行回顾性研究。主要结局为NIPPV失败率(定义为需要再次插管和机械通气);次要结果是医院死亡率和拔管后的ICU停留时间。结果共纳入80例经口鼻罩(90%)和面罩(10%)的患者。 NIPPV期间的80例患者中有41例接受了镇静和/或镇痛治疗(17例使用了镇痛剂,11例使用了镇静剂,13例同时使用了镇静剂和镇痛剂)。他们显示出NIPPV失败率降低(15%对38%,P =?0.015;调整后的奇数比[OR] 0.29,95%置信区间[CI] 0.10-0.86,P =?0.025),死亡率(分别为7%和33%,P = 0.004;校正后的OR 0.14,95%CI 0.03-0.60,P = 0.008),拔管后ICU停留的时间。结论这项临床研究表明,镇静和/或镇痛治疗可以降低NIPPV切除后界面不耐受患者的NIPPV失败率,住院死亡率和ICU LOS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号