首页> 外文期刊>BMC Surgery >A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study)
【24h】

A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study)

机译:一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在研究结肠癌手术患者传统开放,开放fAst追踪恢复和腹腔镜fASt追踪多模式管理的成本最小化(TAPAS研究)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The present developments in colon surgery are characterized by two innovations: the introduction of the laparoscopic operation technique and fast recovery programs such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recovery program. The Tapas-study was conceived to determine which of the three treatment programs: open conventional surgery, open 'ERAS' surgery or laparoscopic 'ERAS' surgery for patients with colon carcinomas is most cost minimizing? Method/design The Tapas-study is a three-arm multicenter prospective cohort study. All patients with colon carcinoma, eligible for surgical treatment within the study period in four general teaching hospitals and one university hospital will be included. This design produces three cohorts: Conventional open surgery is the control exposure (cohort 1). Open surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 2) and laparoscopic surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 3) are the alternative exposures. Three separate time periods are used in order to prevent attrition bias. Primary outcome parameters are the two main cost factors: direct medical costs (real cost price calculation) and the indirect non medical costs (friction method). Secondary outcome parameters are mortality, complications, surgical-oncological resection margins, hospital stay, readmission rates, time back to work/recovery, health status and quality of life. Based on an estimated difference in direct medical costs (highest cost factor) of 38% between open and laparoscopic surgery (alfa = 0.01, beta = 0.05), a group size of 3×40 = 120 patients is calculated. Discussion The Tapas-study is three-arm multicenter cohort study that will provide a cost evaluation of three treatment programs for patients with colon carcinoma, which may serve as a guideline for choice of treatment and investment strategies in hospitals. Trial registration ISRCTN44649165.
机译:背景技术结肠手术的当前发展特点是两项创新:腹腔镜手术技术的引进和快速康复计划,如手术后增强康复(ERAS)康复计划。 Tapas研究的目的是确定三种治疗方案中的哪一种:对结肠癌患者开放的常规手术,开放的“ ERAS”手术或腹腔镜“ ERAS”手术最能降低成本?方法/设计Tapas研究是一项三臂多中心前瞻性队列研究。包括所有在研究期内有资格在四所普通教学医院和一所大学医院接受外科手术治疗的结肠癌患者。该设计产生了三个队列:传统的开放手术是对照暴露(队列1)。可以选择进行ERAS恢复的开放手术(组2)和进行ERAS恢复的腹腔镜手术(组3)。为了防止损耗偏差,使用了三个单独的时间段。主要结果参数是两个主要成本因素:直接医疗费用(实际费用价格计算)和间接非医疗费用(摩擦方法)。次要结果参数是死亡率,并发症,外科肿瘤切除术的余量,住院时间,再入院率,恢复工作/恢复的时间,健康状况和生活质量。根据开腹手术与腹腔镜手术之间的直接医疗费用(最高成本因数)的估计差额(最高成本因数)(α= 0.01,β= 0.05),计算出3×40 = 120例患者。讨论Tapas研究是一项三臂多中心队列研究,将为结肠癌患者提供三种治疗方案的成本评估,这可以作为医院选择治疗和投资策略的指南。试用注册ISRCTN44649165。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号