首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >Deriving objectively-measured sedentary indices from free-living accelerometry data in rural and urban African settings: a cost effective approach
【24h】

Deriving objectively-measured sedentary indices from free-living accelerometry data in rural and urban African settings: a cost effective approach

机译:从非洲农村和城市地区自由生活的加速度计数据中得出客观测量的久坐指数:一种经济有效的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract ObjectivesTo investigate the agreement between two data reduction approaches for detecting sedentary breaks from uni-axial accelerometry data collected in human participants. Free-living, uni-axial accelerometer data (n?=?318) were examined for sedentary breaks using two different methods (Healy–Matthews; MAH/UFFE). The data were cleaned and reduced using MAH/UFFE Analyzer software and custom Microsoft Excel macro’s, such that the average daily sedentary break number were calculated for each data record, for both methods.ResultsThe Healy–Matthews and MAH/UFFE average daily break number correlated closely (R2?=?99.9%) and there was high agreement (mean difference: +?0.7 breaks/day; 95% limits of agreement: ??0.06 to +?1.4 breaks/day). A slight bias of approximately +?1 break/day for the MAH/UFFE Analyzer was evident for both the regression and agreement analyses. At a group level there were no statistically or practically significant differences within sample groups between the two methods.
机译:摘要目的探讨从人类参与者收集的单轴加速度计数据中检测久坐性中断的两种数据缩减方法之间的一致性。使用两种不同的方法(Healy-Matthews; MAH / UFFE)检查了自由活动的单轴加速度计数据(n?=?318)的久坐中断情况。使用MAH / UFFE Analyzer软件和自定义的Microsoft Excel宏对数据进行了清理和缩减,以便为这两种方法计算每个数据记录的平均每日久坐次数。结果Healy-Matthews和MAH / UFFE的平均每日休息次数相关接近(R2?=?99.9%),并且有较高的一致性(均值差:+?0.7中断/天;协议的95%限制:?0.06到+?1.4中断/天)。对于回归分析和一致性分析,MAH / UFFE分析仪的日偏差约为+?1休息日。在组水平上,两种方法在样品组内没有统计学上或实践上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号