首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Comparison of methods for the analysis of airway macrophage particulate load from induced sputum, a potential biomarker of air pollution exposure
【24h】

Comparison of methods for the analysis of airway macrophage particulate load from induced sputum, a potential biomarker of air pollution exposure

机译:比较从诱导痰(可能是空气污染暴露的生物标志物)分析气道巨噬细胞颗粒负荷的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Air pollution is associated with a high burden or morbidity and mortality, but exposure cannot be quantified rapidly or cheaply. The particulate burden of macrophages from induced sputum may provide a biomarker. We compare the feasibility of two methods for digital quantification of airway macrophage particulate load. Methods Induced sputum samples were processed and analysed using ImageJ and Image SXM software packages. We compare each package by resources and time required. Results 13 adequate samples were obtained from 21 patients. Median particulate load was 0.38?μm 2 (ImageJ) and 4.0?% of the total cellular area of macrophages (Image SXM), with no correlation between results obtained using the two methods (correlation coefficient?=??0.42, p?=?0.256). Image SXM took longer than ImageJ (median 26 vs 54 mins per participant, p?=?0.008) and was less accurate based on visual assessment of the output images. ImageJ’s method is subjective and requires well-trained staff. Conclusion Induced sputum has limited application as a screening tool due to the resources required. Limitations of both methods compared here were found: the heterogeneity of induced sputum appearances makes automated image analysis challenging. Further work should refine methodologies and assess inter- and intra-observer reliability, if these methods are to be developed for investigating the relationship of particulate and inflammatory response in the macrophage.
机译:背景技术空气污染与高负担或高发病率和高死亡率相关,但暴露量无法快速或廉价地量化。来自诱导痰的巨噬细胞的颗粒负荷可以提供生物标记。我们比较了两种方法对气道巨噬细胞颗粒负荷进行数字量化的可行性。方法使用ImageJ和Image SXM软件包对痰液样本进行处理和分析。我们根据所需资源和时间比较每个程序包。结果从21例患者中获得了13份足够的样本。中值颗粒负荷为0.38?μm 2 (ImageJ),占巨噬细胞总细胞面积的4.0%(Image SXM),两种方法的结果之间没有相关性(相关系数? (0.42,p = 0.256)。图像SXM花费的时间比ImageJ长(每个参与者的中位数分别为26分钟和54分钟,p = 0.008),根据输出图像的视觉评估,其准确性较低。 ImageJ的方法是主观的,需要训练有素的员工。结论由于需要的资源,诱导痰作为筛查工具的应用有限。此处比较了两种方法的局限性:痰液外观的异质性使自动图像分析具有挑战性。如果要开发这些方法来研究巨噬细胞中微粒与炎症反应的关系,则进一步的工作应完善方法并评估观察者之间和观察者之间的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号