首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
【24h】

A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices

机译:经过内容验证的问卷,用于评估自我报告的静脉采血方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Venous blood sampling is a common procedure in health care. It is strictly regulated by national and international guidelines. Deviations from guidelines due to human mistakes can cause patient harm. Validated questionnaires for health care personnel can be used to assess preventable "near misses"--i.e. potential errors and nonconformities during venous blood sampling practices that could transform into adverse events. However, no validated questionnaire that assesses nonconformities in venous blood sampling has previously been presented. The aim was to test a recently developed questionnaire in self reported venous blood sampling practices for validity and reliability. Findings We developed a questionnaire to assess deviations from best practices during venous blood sampling. The questionnaire contained questions about patient identification, test request management, test tube labeling, test tube handling, information search procedures and frequencies of error reporting. For content validity, the questionnaire was confirmed by experts on questionnaires and venous blood sampling. For reliability, test-retest statistics were used on the questionnaire answered twice. The final venous blood sampling questionnaire included 19 questions out of which 9 had in total 34 underlying items. It was found to have content validity. The test-retest analysis demonstrated that the items were generally stable. In total, 82% of the items fulfilled the reliability acceptance criteria. Conclusions The questionnaire could be used for assessment of "near miss" practices that could jeopardize patient safety and gives several benefits instead of assessing rare adverse events only. The higher frequencies of "near miss" practices allows for quantitative analysis of the effect of corrective interventions and to benchmark preanalytical quality not only at the laboratory/hospital level but also at the health care unit/hospital ward.
机译:背景技术静脉血液采样是医疗保健中的常见程序。它受到国家和国际准则的严格监管。由于人为错误而导致偏离准则可能会导致患者伤害。经验证的医疗保健人员调查表可用于评估可预防的“近失误”,即在静脉采血过程中潜在的错误和不合格之处可能会转化为不良事件。但是,以前没有提供经过验证的问卷来评估静脉血样中的不合格品。目的是在自我报告的静脉血采样方法中测试最近开发的问卷的有效性和可靠性。调查结果我们开发了一份问卷,以评估静脉血样采集过程中与最佳实践的差异。问卷包含有关患者识别,测试请求管理,试管标签,试管处理,信息搜索程序和错误报告频率的问题。为了内容的有效性,该问卷由专家通过问卷调查和静脉血取样确认。为了提高可靠性,对问卷进行了两次重测统计。最终的静脉血抽样调查表包括19个问题,其中9个问题共34个基础项目。发现它具有内容有效性。重测分析表明这些项目总体上是稳定的。总计有82%的项目符合可靠性接受标准。结论该调查表可用于评估“差点就诊”的做法,这种做法可能会危及患者的安全,并带来许多好处,而不仅仅是评估罕见的不良事件。较高频率的“差点错过”做法不仅可以在实验室/医院级别,而且可以在卫生保健部门/医院病房对校正干预措施的效果进行定量分析,并可以作为分析前质量的基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号