首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Gastroenterology >Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
【24h】

Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity

机译:加速胃排空可改善肥胖症的抽吸效率

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The overall effectiveness of aspiration therapy (AT) for obesity relies on optimal aspiration timing after a meal, which can vary depending on a patient’s rate of gastric emptying (GE). Our aim was to identify if baseline GE rates were associated with differences in aspiration efficiency (AE).Methods Subjects from an ongoing AT clinical trial were enrolled in this study. AE was calculated as the absolute gastric residual and calories aspirated at 20 and 40 min. Participants were then divided by baseline GE rate into two groups (slow vs fast). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare AE at 20 and 40 min between the groups. Exploratory linear regression was used to assess relationship between GE and AE.Results 7 patients (85% female) were coenrolled in the study. Mean age and body mass index were 39.8±9.44 and 43±5, respectively. AE did not significantly differ between the 20 and 40 min time points for the group as a whole (34.3% vs 36.9%; p0.5). However, those with fast GE aspirated more calories than those with slow GE (20 min: 200 kcal vs 72.5 kcal; 40 min: 154 kcal vs 63 kcal) (p=0.05). On linear regression, delayed GE was associated with poorer aspiration (20 min: β=?107 calories; p=0.019; R2=0.7). 4/7 patients had significant differences in residual/caloric aspiration across the two time points.Conclusion Patients undergoing AT may benefit from a GE test to optimise their AE. Paradoxically faster GE times saw better aspiration. Prospective studies are revealing a personalised approach to obesity.
机译:背景技术肥胖症的抽吸疗法(AT)的总体效果取决于饭后的最佳抽吸时间,该时间取决于患者的胃排空率(GE)。我们的目的是确定基线GE率是否与抽吸效率(AE)的差异相关。方法本研究纳入了正在进行的AT临床试验的受试者。 AE计算为20和40分钟时的绝对胃残余量和吸入的卡路里。然后将参与者的基线GE率分为两组(慢vs快)。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较两组之间在20和40分钟时的AE。探索性线性回归用于评估GE和AE之间的关系。结果共纳入7例患者(85%为女性)。平均年龄和体重指数分别为39.8±9.44和43±5。整个组的20分钟和40分钟时间点之间的AE没有显着差异(34.3%vs 36.9%; p> 0.5)。但是,GE快的人比GE慢的人摄取更多的卡路里(20分钟:200 kcal vs 72.5 kcal; 40分钟:154 kcal vs 63 kcal)(p = 0.05)。线性回归分析显示,GE延迟与不良吸入有关(20分钟:β=?107卡路里; p = 0.019; R2 = 0.7)。 4/7患者在两个时间点的残余/热量吸入有显着差异。结论接受AT的患者可能受益于GE测试以优化其AE。自相矛盾的是,GE时间更快,抱负更高。前瞻性研究揭示了个性化的肥胖治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号