...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Comparison of cardiovascular co-morbidities and CPAP use in patients with positional and non-positional mild obstructive sleep apnea
【24h】

Comparison of cardiovascular co-morbidities and CPAP use in patients with positional and non-positional mild obstructive sleep apnea

机译:位置性和非位置性轻度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者心血管合并症和CPAP使用的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine if there are differences in cardiovascular co-morbidities, blood pressure (BP) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use between patients with positional-dependent and nonpositional-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods Patients who were referred for overnight polysomnography for suspected OSA between 2007 and 2011 were screened. A total of 371 patients with OSA were included for analysis and divided into six groups according to positional-dependency and severity of OSA: positional mild (n?=?52), positional moderate (n?=?29), positional severe (n?=?24), non-positional mild (n?=?18), non-positional moderate (n?=?70) and non-positional severe group (n?=?178). The six groups were compared for anthropometric and polysomnographic variables, presence of cardiovascular co-morbidities, morning and evening BP and the changes between evening and morning BP, and CPAP device usage patterns. Results Demographic and anthropometric variables showed non-positional severe OSA had poor sleep quality and higher morning blood pressures. Positional mild OSA had the lowest cardiovascular co-morbidities. Overall CPAP acceptance was 45.6%. Mild OSA patients had the lowest CPAP acceptance rate (10%), followed by moderate group (37.37%) and severe group (61.88%, P? Conclusions This study found that positional mild OSA had less cardiovascular co-morbidities compared with subjects with positional severe OSA. Independent of posture, CPAP acceptance in patients with mild OSA was low, but CPAP compliance was similar in CPAP acceptors regardless of posture dependency of OSA. Since there are increasing evidences of greater cardiovascular risk for untreated mild OSA, improving CPAP acceptance among mild OSA patients may be clinically important regardless of posture dependency.
机译:背景这项回顾性队列研究旨在确定在患有位置依赖性和非位置依赖性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的患者之间,心血管合并症,血压(BP)和持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的使用是否存在差异。方法筛选2007年至2011年因疑似OSA而接受通宵多导睡眠图检查的患者。总共371名OSA患者被纳入分析,根据OSA的位置依赖性和严重程度分为六组:轻度(n?=?52),中度(n?=?29),重度(n α=α24),非体位轻度(nα=α18),非体位中度(nα=α70)和非体位严重组(nα=α178)。比较了六个组的人体测量学和多导睡眠图变量,心血管合并症的存在,早晚血压和晚上血压之间的变化以及CPAP设备的使用方式。结果人口统计学和人体测量学变量显示,非体位性严重OSA的睡眠质量较差,早晨血压较高。轻度OSA位置的心血管合并症最低。 CPAP总体接受率为45.6%。轻度OSA患者的CPAP接受率最低(10%),其次是中度组(37.37%)和重度组(61.88%,P?)结论本研究发现,与轻度OSA患者相比,轻度OSA患者的心血管合并症较少重度OSA。轻度OSA患者的CPAP接受率低,与姿势无关,但无论OSA的姿势依赖性如何,CPAP接受者的CPAP依从性相似。由于越来越多的证据表明未经治疗的轻度OSA的心血管风险更大,因此改善了CPAP接受率无论姿势依赖性如何,轻度OSA患者在临床上可能都很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号