首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments
【24h】

The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments

机译:在线和实验室实验中介体最终测试线索和相关最终测试线索的测试效果

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe testing effect is the finding that information that is retrieved during learning is more often correctly retrieved on a final test than information that is restudied. According to the semantic mediator hypothesis the testing effect arises because retrieval practice of cue-target pairs ( mother-child ) activates semantically related mediators ( father ) more than restudying. Hence, the mediator-target ( father-child ) association should be stronger for retrieved than restudied pairs. Indeed, Carpenter (2011) found a larger testing effect when participants received mediators ( father ) than when they received target-related words ( birth ) as final test cues. MethodsThe present study started as an attempt to test an alternative account of Carpenter’s results. However, it turned into a series of conceptual (Experiment 1) and direct (Experiment 2 and 3) replications conducted with online samples. The results of these online replications were compared with those of similar existing laboratory experiments through small-scale meta-analyses. ResultsThe results showed that (1) the magnitude of the raw mediator testing effect advantage is comparable for online and laboratory experiments, (2) in both online and laboratory experiments the magnitude of the raw mediator testing effect advantage is smaller than in Carpenter’s original experiment, and (3) the testing effect for related cues varies considerably between online experiments. ConclusionsThe variability in the testing effect for related cues in online experiments could point toward moderators of the related cue short-term testing effect. The raw mediator testing effect advantage is smaller than in Carpenter’s original experiment.
机译:背景测试的结果是发现,在学习过程中检索到的信息比经过重新评估的信息更经常在最终测试中正确检索。根据语义中介者假说,之所以产生测试效果,是因为提示-目标对(母子)的检索实践对语义相关中介者(父亲)的激活要比重新学习更多。因此,检索到的中介者-目标(父子)关联应比重新研究的配对更强。的确,Carpenter(2011)发现,参与者接受调解者(父亲)的测试效果要好于接受目标相关词语(出生)作为最终测试线索的测试效果。方法本研究的开始是为了尝试检验Carpenter结果的替代方法。但是,它变成了对在线样本进行的一系列概念(实验1)和直接(实验2和3)复制。通过小规模的荟萃分析,将这些在线复制的结果与类似的现有实验室实验的结果进行了比较。结果结果表明(1)原始介体测试效果优势的大小在在线和实验室实验中是可比的;(2)在在线和实验室实验中,原始介体测试效果优势的大小都比Carpenter的原始实验小, (3)在线实验之间,有关线索的测试效果差异很大。结论在线实验中相关线索的测试效果的变化可能指向相关线索短期测试效果的调节者。原始介体测试效果的优势小于Carpenter的原始实验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号