首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >Comparison of two psycho-educational family group interventions for improving psycho-social outcomes in persons with spinal cord injury and their caregivers: a randomized-controlled trial of multi-family group intervention versus an active education control condition
【24h】

Comparison of two psycho-educational family group interventions for improving psycho-social outcomes in persons with spinal cord injury and their caregivers: a randomized-controlled trial of multi-family group intervention versus an active education control condition

机译:比较两种心理教育家庭小组干预措施以改善脊髓损伤患者及其护理人员的心理社会结局:多家庭小组干预与积极教育控制条件的随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundOver 12,000 individuals suffer a spinal cord injury (SCI) annually in the United States, necessitating long-term, complex adjustments and responsibilities for patients and their caregivers. Despite growing evidence that family education and support improves the management of chronic conditions for care recipients as well as caregiver outcomes, few systematic efforts have been made to involve caregivers in psycho-educational interventions for SCI. As a result, a serious gap exists in accumulated knowledge regarding effective, family-based treatment strategies for improving outcomes for individuals with SCI and their caregivers. The proposed research aims to fill this gap by evaluating the efficacy of a structured adaptation of an evidence-based psychosocial group treatment called Multi-Family Group (MFG) intervention. The objective of this study is to test, in a randomized-controlled design, an MFG intervention for the treatment of individuals with SCI and their primary caregivers. Our central hypothesis is that by providing support in an MFG format, we will improve coping skills of persons with SCI and their caregivers as well as supportive strategies employed by caregivers. MethodsWe will recruit 32 individuals with SCI who have been discharged from inpatient rehabilitation within the previous 3?years and their primary caregivers. Patient/caregiver pairs will be randomized to the MFG intervention or an active SCI education control (SCIEC) condition in a two-armed randomized trial design. Participants will be assessed pre- and post-program and 6?months post-program. Intent to treat analyses will test two a priori hypotheses: (1) MFG-SCI will be superior to SCIEC for SCI patient activation, health status, and emotion regulation, caregiver burden and health status, and relationship functioning, and (2) MFG will be more effective for individuals with SCI and their caregivers when the person with SCI is within 18?months of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation compared to when the person is between 19 and 36?months post discharge. DiscussionSupport for our hypotheses will indicate that MFG-SCI is superior to specific education for assisting patients and their caregivers in the management of difficult, long-term, life adjustments in the months and years after SCI, with increased efficacy closer in time to the injury. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02161913 . Registered 10 June 2014.
机译:背景技术在美国,每年有超过12,000人遭受脊髓损伤(SCI),这需要对患者及其护理人员进行长期,复杂的调整并承担责任。尽管越来越多的证据表明,家庭教育和支持可以改善护理对象的慢性病状况以及护理人员的结局,但很少有系统的努力使护理人员参与SCI的心理教育干预。结果,在关于有效的基于家庭的治疗策略以改善SCI患者及其看护者的结局的知识积累方面存在严重差距。拟议的研究旨在通过评估基于证据的心理社会团体治疗(称为多家庭团体(MFG)干预)的结构调整的功效来填补这一空白。这项研究的目的是在随机对照设计中测试MFG干预措施,以治疗SCI及其主要护理人员。我们的中心假设是,通过以MFG格式提供支持,我们将改善SCI患者及其照护者的应对技巧以及照护者采用的支持策略。方法我们将招募32名在过去3年内因住院康复出院的SCI患者及其主要护理人员。在两臂随机试验设计中,患者/护理人员对将根据MFG干预或主动SCI教育控制(SCIEC)条件进行随机分组。参加者将在课程前和课程后以及课程后6个月进行评估。治疗意图分析将检验两个先验假设:(1)MFG-SCI在SCI患者的激活,健康状况和情绪调节,照顾者负担和健康状况以及关系功能方面将优于SCIEC,以及(2)MFG-SCI当SCI患者在住院康复出院后18个月之内时,与SCI患者及其护理者在出院后19至36个月之内相比,其效果更好。讨论支持我们的假设将表明,MFG-SCI在帮助患者及其护理人员应对SCI后数月和数年的困难,长期,生活调整的管理方面优于特定的教育,并且随着伤害的发生而更及时地提高疗效。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02161913。 2014年6月10日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号