...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ paediatrics open. >Using laxatives and/or enemas to accelerate the diagnosis in children presenting with acute abdominal pain: a randomised controlled trial study protocol
【24h】

Using laxatives and/or enemas to accelerate the diagnosis in children presenting with acute abdominal pain: a randomised controlled trial study protocol

机译:使用泻药和/或灌肠来加速患有急性腹痛的儿童的诊断:一项随机对照试验研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction Many children with acute abdominal pain and suspicion of appendicitis are diagnosed with constipation. Nevertheless, it can be difficult to differentiate between acute constipation and acute appendicitis because of similar symptoms and lack of diagnostic criteria. Consequently, constipation is often missed despite repeated consultations at the emergency department. We hypothesise that the diagnostic process can be improved and adequate treatment accelerated by supporting faecal evacuation in children with acute abdominal pain. Methods and analysis An unblinded randomised controlled trial including children aged between 5 years and 18 years with acute abdominal pain and suspicion of acute appendicitis. Children who do not have a definitive diagnosis after the first consultation and who need to return for a second consultation will be randomised. The intervention group will receive laxatives and enemas, while the control group will receive no medication. If, after the second consultation, still no diagnosis is established, and a third consultation is needed, then the intervention group will receive only laxatives, and the control group will again not receive medication. The primary outcome will be the differences in abdominal pain scores obtained with FACES Pain Rating Scale and the visual analogue scale at first, second and possibly third consultation. The secondary outcome will be the number of consultations needed to reach final diagnosis. Ethics and dissemination Laxatives and enemas have proven to be safe and effective treatments for constipation in children. Adverse events are therefore not expected, however, should they occur, then the child concerned shall be properly followed and treated until the event is over. The local Medical Research Ethics Committee approved of this study and waived the otherwise mandatory insurance for human test subjects. Trial registration numbers Pre-results: CCMO NL44710.042.12 andEudraCT 2013-000498-56.
机译:简介许多患有急性腹痛并怀疑阑尾炎的儿童被诊断为便秘。然而,由于症状相似和缺乏诊断标准,可能难以区分急性便秘和急性阑尾炎。因此,尽管在急诊部门反复咨询,但经常会遗漏便秘。我们假设通过支持急性腹痛患儿的粪便疏散可以改善诊断过程,并加快适当的治疗。方法和分析一项无盲的随机对照试验,包括5岁至18岁之间患有急性腹痛并怀疑患有急性阑尾炎的儿童。第一次咨询后没有明确诊断且需要再次进行第二次咨询的儿童将被随机分配。干预组将接受泻药和灌肠,而对照组将不接受药物治疗。如果在第二次咨询后仍未确定诊断,并且需要第三次咨询,则干预组将仅接受泻药,而对照组将不再接受药物治疗。主要结果将是通过FACES疼痛评分量表和视觉模拟量表在第一次,第二次和可能的第三次咨询中获得的腹痛评分的差异。次要结果是达到最终诊断所需的咨询次数。伦理与传播泻药和灌肠已被证明是治疗儿童便秘的安全有效方法。因此,不期望发生不良事件,但是,如果发生不良事件,则应适当跟踪并治疗有关儿童,直到事件结束为止。当地医学研究伦理委员会批准了本研究,并放弃了针对人体测试受试者的其他强制性保险。试用注册号结果:CCMO NL44710.042.12和EudraCT 2013-000498-56。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号