首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >Can theory of mind deficits be measured reliably in people with mild and moderate Alzheimer’s dementia?
【24h】

Can theory of mind deficits be measured reliably in people with mild and moderate Alzheimer’s dementia?

机译:轻度和中度阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症患者的心智缺陷理论能否可靠地测量?

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundPatients suffering from Alzheimer’s dementia develop difficulties in social functioning. This has led to an interest in the study of “theory of mind” in this population. However, difficulty has arisen because the associated cognitive demands of traditional short story theory of mind assessments result in failure per se in this population, making it challenging to test pure theory of mind ability. MethodsSimplified, traditional 1st and 2nd order theory of mind short story tasks and a battery of alternative theory of mind cartoon jokes and control slapstick cartoon jokes, without memory components, were administered to 16 participants with mild-moderate Alzheimer’s dementia, and 11 age-matched healthy controls. ResultsNo significant differences were detected between participants with Alzheimer’s dementia and controls on the 1st or 2nd order traditional short story theory of mind tasks (p?=?0.155 and p?=?0.154 respectively). However, in the cartoon joke tasks there were significant differences in performance between the Alzheimer participants and the control group, this was evident for both theory of mind cartoons and the control ‘slapstick’ jokes. ConclusionIt remains very difficult to assess theory of mind as an isolated phenomenon in populations with global cognitive impairment, such as Alzheimer’s dementia, as the tasks used to assess this cognition invariably depend on other cognitive functions. Although a limitation of this study is the small sample size, the results suggest that there is no measurable specific theory of mind deficit in people with Alzheimer's dementia, and that the use of theory of mind representational models to measure social cognitive ability may not be appropriate in this population.
机译:背景患有阿尔茨海默氏症的患者在社交功能上会遇到困难。这引起了对该人群中“心理理论”研究的兴趣。然而,由于传统的短篇心理理论评估的相关认知需求导致该人群本身的失败,因此出现了困难,这使得测试纯粹的心理理论能力具有挑战性。方法对16名轻度中度阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症患者和11名年龄相匹配的参与者进行简化,传统的一阶和二阶心理理论的短篇小说任务以及一系列另类的心理理论卡通笑话和控制性闹剧卡通笑话(无记忆成分)健康对照。结果阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症的参与者与一阶或二阶传统短篇故事心理任务控制者之间没有发现显着差异(分别为p?=?0.155和p?=?0.154)。但是,在卡通笑话任务中,阿尔茨海默氏症参与者和对照组之间的表现存在显着差异,这对于心理卡通理论和控制“闹剧”笑话都是显而易见的。结论在作为整体认知障碍(例如阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症)的人群中,将心理理论评估为孤立现象仍然非常困难,因为评估这种认知的任务总是取决于其他认知功能。尽管这项研究的局限性在于样本量太小,但结果表明,阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症患者没有可测量的特定的心理缺陷理论,并且使用心理表征模型来衡量社会认知能力可能不适合在这个人口中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号