首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Quality >A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?
【24h】

A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?

机译:临终关怀医院认知评估的质量改进方法:我们可以使用4AT还是Short CAM?

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Prevalence studies show that 13%–42% of patients admitted to specialist palliative care inpatient units have delirium. Symptoms of delirium are often subtle and easily missed, or misdiagnosed as fatigue or depression, and so the use of a screening tool could improve early identification and management of delirium and lead to improved outcomes. Patients admitted to hospices are often frail and tired, therefore a quick and easy-to-use method of cognitive assessment is essential.Methods A quality improvement (QI) approach (PDSA: Plan, Do, Study, Act) was used to improve screening for delirium on admission to a hospice unit. A baseline measure was taken of the rate of performance of cognitive assessment on admission. Five PDSA cycles were then undertaken which involved implementing change and then evaluating results through auditing case notes and interviewing staff.Results The first cycle determined staff preference between two cognitive assessment methods: the Short Confusion Assessment Method and the four 9A9s Test (4AT). Two further PDSA cycles embedded the 4AT (the preferred tool) into the admission process, establishing it as a usable tool in the hospice setting for up to 92% of admissions. A subsequent cycle showing poor sustainability prompted staff education and changes to admission documentation, resulting in an increase in cognitive assessment being performed, from 50% to 76%.Conclusion The 4AT is a usable tool in the hospice inpatient setting to assess patients’ cognitive state on admission and can easily be incorporated into the admission process. The QI approach highlighted the need to link staff awareness of their use of the screening tool with perceived improvements in the treatment of delirium, which prompted the creation and implementation of a ‘Delirium Checklist’. Some initial lack of sustainability was addressed by staff education and changes to the admission paperwork to ensure compliance with the use of the 4AT and sustained improvement in screening for cognitive impairment.
机译:背景患病率研究表明,接受专科姑息治疗住院患者的患者中有13%–42%患有del妄。 of妄的症状通常很细微,很容易遗漏,或者被误诊为疲劳或抑郁,因此使用筛查工具可以改善identification妄的早期识别和管理,并改善结局。入院的患者通常身体虚弱和疲倦,因此必须使用快速且易于使用的认知评估方法。方法采用质量改善(QISA)方法(PDSA:计划,实施,研究,实施)来改善筛查入院后ice妄。对入院时认知评估的执行率进行了基线测量。然后进行了五个PDSA周期,其中涉及实施变更,然后通过审核案例笔记和与工作人员面谈来评估结果。结果第一个周期确定了员工在两种认知评估方法之间的偏好:简短混乱评估方法和四个9A9s测试(4AT)。另外两个PDSA周期将4AT(首选工具)嵌入到录取过程中,使它成为临终关怀设置中可用的工具,最多可容纳92%的录取。随后的周期显示出可持续性差,这促使员工进行了教育,并更改了入院文件,从而使认知评估的比例从50%上升到76%。结论4AT是临终关怀住院患者评估患者认知状态的有用工具录取时可以很容易地纳入录取过程。 QI方法强调了需要将员工使用筛查工具的意识与with妄治疗的明显改进联系起来,这促使创建和实施“ Delirium检查表”。员工的教育和入学文书工作的变更解决了最初缺乏可持续性的问题,以确保符合4AT的使用并持续改善认知障碍筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号